Here's What Shocked a Former MSNBC Analyst About Erika Kirk's Heartbreaking Address
Spanberger Faces Questions As Chesterfield School Board Member Urged to Resign Over Charli...
Trustee Resigns As Oxford Union Faces Backlash After President-Elect Celebrates Charlie Ki...
South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson Introduces Bill to Re-Impose Jackson-Vanik Sanctions on Rus...
Discourse Over Violence
I Am a Yankee Doodle Dandy
Jury Indicts 8 For Fraud, Tax Scheme
St. Louis Attorney Pleads Guilty to COVID Fraud
Pilots, Other Professionals Who Mocked Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Get Grounded
TMZ’s Harvey Levin Walks Back Staff's Applause for Kirk’s Death, Now Warns of...
18,000 New Chapters Apply Overnight After Erika Kirk's Speech
Maher Calls Bible 'Wicked'; Ben Shapiro Reminds Him He Was Born on Biblical...
David Hogg: 'Politicize the F*ck Out of My Death' to Push Gun Control...
Charlie Kirk to Be Honored with Stadium Memorial as Thousands Expected to Mourn...
Feds Probe Left-Wing Groups for Possible Ties to Charlie Kirk Killing as One...
OPINION

Despite Market Nerves, China Deal Could be Big – or Could Flop

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
AP Photo/Andy Wong, File

As President Trump’s renewed threat to impose 25 percent tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese goods rattles global markets, three realities take center stage.  Global markets are looking to see if the White House understands them.  If so, bring on the bulls.  If not, beware the bears.  

Advertisement

First, if this deal becomes heavier on short-term politics than meaningful first steps toward structural reform in the US-Chinese economic relationship, the deal should be shelved.  Juice will not be worth the squeeze. 

If the deal devolves into heaps of soybeans and cotton for China, but no stopping of forced technology and intellectual property transfers, no reduced auto tariffs, no return to fairness at the World Trade Organization, no permanent curbs on currency manipulation, and no structural reform, the photo-op won’t be worth the trade flop.   

Second, if big steps toward structural realignment do appear in the agreement, along with measurable American trade advantages, Democrats and Republicans should consider fast-tracking it – but only if enforcement mechanisms make these terms real.  This part is hard, since China is a communist country used to dictating not cooperating, and as the world’s No. 2 economy, holding many USA bonds, has some leverage.   

As the world’s No. 1 economy – growing faster than most – the United States has leverage, including the ability to turn off lights on China’s 5-G rollout and “Belt and Road” initiatives in many parts of the world.   That leverage should be used to insert as much accountability as possible. For this agreement to stick, enforcement must be non-negotiable.

Advertisement

Third, at the nation-to-nation level, trade is never just about trade.  It is also about comparative and competitive advantage, preserving national and mutual security, sustaining or raising living standards, and protecting the populations of both countries.  

For the United States to come out a winner, this means not just equalizing trade terms and assuring enforceability, but expressly protecting American labor, preventing security risks like engineering theft and espionage, creating mutual dependence in maritime and space venues, and turning off illicit drug exports like fentanyl to the United States.  

In short, despite market nervousness, this China deal could be big, structural, enforceable, and layered in market-popping ways we have not seen in decades – if ever.  On the other hand, it could come to nothing more than tart tweets, soybeans and 2020 politics.  Let’s hope for the best, give market rattling a rest, and see what emerges.  We should know soon, one way or the other.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement