Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
The Ultimate Christmas List for Conservatives
Socialism vs. Capitalism
MAHA | Make Travel Family Friendly Again
This Is Not a Test
60 Minutes Offers 'Syrupy Minutes' for the Left
The Common Faith of Elise Stefanik and Erika Kirk
'Experts' Continue to Get It Wrong As Trump Shatters Jobs Expectations and Rebuilds...
Should Have Been Aborted
Transformational Change Often Looks Like a Failure in the Middle
In the Dark in San Francisco
Destroying Countrysides to Save Earth From a Climate Non-Crisis
Voluntary Deportations Gain Steam
Seattle Public Health Officials Give Hilarious Advice to Solve 'Toilet Rat' Epidemic
Democrat Mayor Says City Residents Might Kill ICE Agents Who Enforce the Law...
OPINION
Premium

Why Can't We Confidently Say the Entire Trump Indictment Is True?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Townhall Media

Editor's Note: Watch the latest edition of "And Another Thing... with Larry O'Connor" and access even more exclusive reporting, columns, podcasts, and videos from your favorite writers by joining Townhall VIP!

"If even half of what's in this indictment against Donald Trump is true, he's in big trouble." You heard that all over the place this weekend from every analyst and Republican allowed on the Sunday shows. They all said the same thing: "Wow, this is a really damning indictment if even half of it is true." And this is not a condemnation of those people, but I want to focus on this one, very interesting area. Hearing that over and over and over, it struck me. Why aren't all of these analysts saying Donald Trump is in huge trouble and he's going to jail, 100%? Why do they have to put the caveat "if half of it is true"? Why would only half of the indictment be true? In fact, why would there be anything in an indictment from the federal government that is not 100% true?


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement