Some Republicans Know How to Win
The OPEC Cartel Crackup
Zyn Isn't Sin
Jake Tapper Wants to Shield Jokes From Criticism...Unless He Is the One Dictating...
Educated to Death
Charlie Kirk Changed My College Decision
The Media Could Attempt a 'Nonpartisan Bias'
How to Think About Affordability
Your Whereabouts Are Known at All Times
Two Nations With Shared Values
Clarence Thomas Sounds the Alarm: Progressivism’s Direct Assault on the Declaration of Ind...
Finland Study Shows 'Gender Affirming Care' Is Losing the Science. Children’s Hospitals Be...
Is SCOTUS Ducking Transgender School Cases?
You Will Own Nothing
Marco Rubio Is Standing Up to China Over This Major Trade Partner
OPINION
Premium

Why Can't We Confidently Say the Entire Trump Indictment Is True?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Why Can't We Confidently Say the Entire Trump Indictment Is True?
Townhall Media

Editor's Note: Watch the latest edition of "And Another Thing... with Larry O'Connor" and access even more exclusive reporting, columns, podcasts, and videos from your favorite writers by joining Townhall VIP!

"If even half of what's in this indictment against Donald Trump is true, he's in big trouble." You heard that all over the place this weekend from every analyst and Republican allowed on the Sunday shows. They all said the same thing: "Wow, this is a really damning indictment if even half of it is true." And this is not a condemnation of those people, but I want to focus on this one, very interesting area. Hearing that over and over and over, it struck me. Why aren't all of these analysts saying Donald Trump is in huge trouble and he's going to jail, 100%? Why do they have to put the caveat "if half of it is true"? Why would only half of the indictment be true? In fact, why would there be anything in an indictment from the federal government that is not 100% true?


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement