There's One GOP Senator Who Knows the Dangers of Letting This BBB Provision...
Here's What Senate Dems Plan to Do to Gum Up the Works for...
Well, We Knew This GOP Senator Was Going to Screw Us
Supreme Court Made a Surprising Move in the Louisiana Redistricting Case Yesterday
Hegseth Reveals the Official New Name of the USNS Harvey Milk
JD Vance Arrives at Senate to Potentially Cast Tie-Breaking Vote on Trump's BBB
Sabotage? Schumer Drags Out Trump’s BBB With All-Night Stunt to Delay GOP Victory
DHS Raids Los Angeles Home Tied to Iranian Smuggling Ring; Terror Watchlist Suspects...
Senate Gears Up to Vote on Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’
UPDATE: Sen. Lee Drops Proposal to Sell Off Federal Land after GOP Lawmakers...
Far-Left Comedian Blames Trump for Her Overeating, Alcohol Abuse, and Depression
Ex-Hochul and Cuomo Aide Arrested As Chinese Agent, Kash Patel Calls for Full...
Nowhere to Run: DeSantis’ 'Alligator Alcatraz' Targets Border Crisis with Swamp Security
Did You Catch This Awkward Moment at a WNBA Game This Week?
As Kamala Harris Slips in Support for 2028, Another Top Candidate Also Has...
OPINION

Business Hands Tied by Double Taxation

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

A new survey out from the Association of Financial Professionals finds that business experts don't see a promising landscape in 2011.

The 2011 AFP Business Outlook Survey took a sample of finance professionals' opinions and found that, even though a growth bounce-back is expected, the jobs market may not see substantial recovery until 2012 or afterwards. Some of the biggest concerns are tax uncertainty, the size of the federal deficit and volatility of the US dollar.

Advertisement

One particular area of focus for the AFP survey was on the impact of corporate taxes on repatriated earnings. Corporations with a base in the United States do business in countries all over the world and follow the tax policies of those countries. Unlike many other countries, however, the United States subjects money imported back into the country to an effective 35% tax rate.

The result is that companies will refuse to bring money made overseas back to the United States to reinvest. And that can make a huge difference.

In 2005, the U.S. temporarily lowered, for one year, its repatriation tax from 35% to 5.25%. Repatriation soared, going from under $100 billion to over $300 billion. According to a study by Allen Sinai at Decision Economics, that money was used for capital investment, hiring and training of employees, research and development and debt relief.

Brian Kalish, Director of Finance Practice at AFP, says that the reason the tax exists is that the US government thinks that they'll eventually get their 35%. But that's not true in today's globalized world.

"There's a fallacy," Kalish says, "they don't ever have to bring the money back. And if they don't bring the money back, your tax revenue is zero." Rather than repatriate their foreign earnings, corporations can just continue to invest and develop overseas.

It doesn't have to be this way. As John Chambers and Safra Catz recently noted in the Wall Street Journal:

The U.S. government's treatment of repatriated foreign earnings stands in marked contrast to the tax practices of almost every major developed economy, including Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy, Russia, Australia and Canada, to name a few. Companies headquartered in any of these countries can repatriate foreign earnings to their home countries at a tax rate of 0%-2%. That's because those countries realize that choking off foreign capital from their economies is decidedly against their national interests.

Advertisement

Sinai's study points to an additional $565 billion that would be repatriated and reinvested in the United States if a similar policy to the 2005 holiday were to be enacted. While job growth wouldn't be immediately seen, the long-term implications of a lower repatriation tax could be enormous.

"It is not, in all honesty, something that's going to happen tomorrow," Kalish forecasts. "I think it'll probably be part of a larger change in the tax code. Though, to the extent that the Adminstration and Congress does go down that path, we think that it will be an element in reform."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement