Get access to Brad Slager's "Riffed From the Headlines," a daily VIP feature where he looks to bring accountability to the mainstream media. Use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!
Legalized Press-titution – ABC NEWS
We eagerly await the sniper fan-fiction from Gutman.
In an appallingly tasteless segment, ABC reporter Matt Gutman was delivering a rhapsodic, almost cloyingly warm report about Charlie Kirk’s shooter sending affectionate notes to his lover.
DISGUSTING: ABC’s Matt Gutman says he’s not sure “if we have seen an alleged murder with such specific text messages” that were “very touching, in a way, that I think many of us didn’t expect — a very intimate portrait into this relationship between the suspect’s roommate and the… pic.twitter.com/ulPcxoOwM3
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 16, 2025
More than a one-off, Gutman repeated his swooning in a later report.
ABC’s Matt Gutman doubled down, ten minutes later after this on ABC News Live: “It’s heartbreaking on so many levels, Kyra. Obviously, Charlie Kirk was murdered brutally in front of a crowd of thousands...[O]n the other hand, there is this duality of a very a portrait of a very… pic.twitter.com/0ykDhsg1Ko
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 16, 2025
Unsurprisingly, he was on the receiving end of mockery and scorn for his “A Sniper’s Love Story” approach, and as a result, Gutman came out with a mea culpa for his fawning coverage.
Body Checking the Fact-Checkers – CNN
Bringing on an authority just to muddle the details.
To clarify the intentions of Kirk’s killer, CNN brought on a professor from Notre Dame to “decipher” what all of the messaging from the assassin could mean.
His helpful analysis? "Meh, this stuff is from all over and could mean just about anything."
Well, now, thank you…for…something…
🚨CNN brings on an "expert" to decipher the political implications of the messages inscribed on bullet casings lefts by Charlie Kirk's assassin:
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 16, 2025
"These four messages...are very common online tropes. They're memes. They appear all over the internet in funny, in light-hearted, in… pic.twitter.com/Eyc9K5IWCH
Low-Octane Gaslighting – MSNBC
Shouldn’t an online expert be – you know – online?
Brandy Zadrozny was on to lend her expertise about the internet and social media, regarding the fallout from the assassination. Her assessment? There is no proof anyone has been celebrating Chrlie Kirk’s death.
MSNBC’s Zadrozny: To suggest people on the internet are cheering for the murder of Charlie Kirk is “the total opposite of what’s actually happening."
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) September 16, 2025
Their lying simply knows no bounds. None. pic.twitter.com/9iz8LLxH4B
This is such a laughably weak lie that one only needs to cite the news reports whining about people being fired for this very thing. Or that on Bluesky, they had to come forward and warn users to cease posting such comments.
Or how about her own network needing to fire Matthew Dowd over comments he made to that effect?
News Avoidance Syndrome – CNN
The new standard at the network is now 100% certification.
Thinking back on past instances of severe crimes, CNN has never held back on speculation about motives. Yet, as more information on Charlie Kirk’s murderer spill out, suddenly putting together a composite is off the table.
Kaitlan Collins entered into a contentious discussion with Senator Ted Cruz as she refused to place any motivation on the killer, insisting that it is all still a mystery.
WATCH:
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) September 17, 2025
CNN's Kaitlan Collins on the Charlie Kirk assassination: "We don't have a motive yet. We don't know yet. We're waiting..."
Sen. Ted Cruz: "Of course we know. Come one. 'We don't have a motive yet. We know we don't have a motive yet.' Really, that's CNN's position? He… pic.twitter.com/n2ERQpoa73
Both Kinds of Standards – MSNBC
Now, Joe, if it was wrong then, that means…?
In the desperate practice of whataboutism, on “Morning Joe,” the eponymous host tried to deflect from the reactions to the Kirk killing by leveling charges that the right is more prone to violence. He brought up examples of violence against the left, like the Governor Josh Shapiro firebombing. (Ahem…)
Next, Scar-Joe segued to bring up the attack on Paul Pelosi and the reaction to that crime. What Joe missed out on is that by making this comparison, he is equating the poisonous reactions and, therefore, admitting what is heard today is unacceptable.
WATCH:
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) September 17, 2025
CNN's Kaitlan Collins on the Charlie Kirk assassination: "We don't have a motive yet. We don't know yet. We're waiting..."
Sen. Ted Cruz: "Of course we know. Come one. 'We don't have a motive yet. We know we don't have a motive yet.' Really, that's CNN's position? He… pic.twitter.com/n2ERQpoa73
Prose & Contradictions – CNN
You say they must stop punishing those who don't do it?
In another heated debate, Kate Bedingfield was upset at the DOJ supposedly punishing people for saying hateful things about the Kirk killing. In her argument, she was insisting that no Democrats were saying anything of the sort.
Then why get so upset over retaliation if no one is doing or saying the very thing being retaliated over?
CNN commentator Kate Bedingfield claims that she has seen “nothing” negative about Charlie Kirk from Democrats.
— Media Lies (@MediasLies) September 16, 2025
Is she blind? pic.twitter.com/Gl61Hj7F0s
