Did Bill Maher Really Just Say That About Q'Anon?
Trump Can End America’s Immigration Chaos — If Congress Is Forced to Act
Is This the End of Transgender Hysteria?
If Epstein Did Not Exist, They Would Have Had to Invent Him
Pollsters Don't Ask If Anti-ICE Activists Have 'Gone Too Far'
Did Trump Just Deliver the Biggest Prescription Drug Reform Week in History?
Will Falling Birth Rates Mean a More Conservative World?
Economic Diplomacy and the New American Playbook
115 Years After His Birth, Reagan's 'Shining City on a Hill' Is Still...
Who Jeffrey Epstein Really Was and Why the Story Still Matters
Oman Talks: Why Tehran Will Not Yield — and Why the West Must...
Solving the 'Affordability Crisis' in U.S. Healthcare Starts With Hospital Reform
I’m a Married Woman. No, the SAVE Act Won’t Disenfranchise Me.
White House Launches TrumpRX to Slash Prescription Drug Cost
Jamaican Man Allegedly Stole 33,000 Pounds of Frozen Snow Crab, $400,000 of Designer...
OPINION

Inequality worsens under Obama, reaches historic high

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

What you won't hear from Barack Obama in Tuesday's State of the Union address is the truth about Benghazi, or the IRS's continued targeting of conservatives and Tea Party groups, or the disasters behind the roll out of ObamaCare, or an admission that his economic policies have failed to lead a recovery, or an explanation as to why he green-lighted Iran's nuke ambitions, etc., etc., etc.

Advertisement

What you will hear is a lot about income inequality; "the defining challenge of our time" as he calls it.

If he really believes that it is such a big issue, then he needs to explain why he has failed so miserably with that one, too.

According to Gallup 67 percent of Americans are dissatisfied with the way income and wealth are currently distributed in the U.S. Barack Obama is an adept enough populist to talk about what significant majorities of Americans want to hear, especially at a time when a growing number of voters are unhappy with him.

After all, this is the same Barack Obama who guaranteed anxious millions "if you like your health care plan you can keep it. Period." He has no problem telling you what you want to hear; he just has a problem delivering.

However, even Obama's normally adoring media can't ignore the facts. "But of course, income inequality has actually gotten much worse under Obama's watch," wrote the folks at MSN Money this week in anticipation of Tuesday's SOTU speech. Median household income fell 4.4 percent during Obama's first term in office, they also pointed out.

If you're compelled to listen to the SOTU on Tuesday night as I feel obligated to do, just remember the following graph courtesy ofInvestor's Business Dailyand John Merline.

Advertisement

As indicated income inequality has increased faster under Obama than either Bill Clinton or George W. Bush, and is now at the highest level since the Census Department began recording data in 1947. Actually, under Bush – who Obama loves to vilify – there was no net increase at all.

Importantly, Merline cites official government data from the government's Gini Index. These are the Obama Administration's numbers.

Merline concludes that the policies Obama "is pushing now have either had little impact on inequality or have provided few benefits to those they're supposed to help." He then provides a summary review of many of those policies, the full text of which can be found here. It's an important read.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement