The Stakes in Wisconsin's Supreme Court Race Are High. Here's Why.
Sorry, Libs, the People Still Support Trump Deporting Illegals
Anti-Gunner Organization Just Made the Case for Trans-Identified People to Own Firearms
Here's What's at Stake for Republicans in Wisconsin's Supreme Court Elections
Iran Loads Up Missiles After Trump Issues Threat
Colorado Far From Finished Infringing on Gun Rights
How the Left Downplays Politically-Motivated Crime As Just Protests
More 'Extremely Dangerous Criminals' Have Been Sent to El Salvador
Dems Say Wisconsin Is Not for Sale. Walker Hits Them With the Facts.
The High Cost of Coastal Litigation: A Threat to Louisiana’s Economy and Trump’s...
DOGE Will Look Into Lawmakers Who Became 'Strangely Wealthy'
Another Poll Shows Democrats in Disarray Over How the Party Is Handling Trump
Trump's Answer to a Question About a Third-Term Is Sure to Trigger the...
Here’s Why the LA Times Is Suing Mayor Karen Bass
Scott Jennings Goes Up Against Former Pentagon Spokesperson on 'Signalgate'
OPINION

Joe the Plumber Doesn't Need a License

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Joe "The Plumber" Wurzelbacher, the Republican Party's newest working-class hero from Ohio, has been ridiculed and had his private life probed since he had the nerve to confront Barack Obama about taxation last week.

Advertisement

For liberals, one of Joe's biggest crimes against humanity - besides apparently owing about $2,000 in back taxes - is the charge that he works as a plumber but doesn't have a plumber's license.

In Ohio Joe's not required by law to get a license before he can practice plumbing. But he need to get a license if he decides he'd rather make his living as an accountant, architect, barber, chiropractor, cosmetologist, dental hygienist, dentist, paramedic, funeral director, hearing aid fitter, insurance agent, land surveyor, lawyer, nursing home administrator, nurse, occupational therapist, optometrist, pesticide applicator, pharmacist, physical therapist, physician assistant, physician, podiatrist, psychologist, public school teacher, real estate agent, real estate appraiser, school counselor, stock broker, social worker, truck driver, veterinarian or vet's assistant.

Before Joe Wurzelbacher or anyone else wants to become Joe the Barber or Joe the Podiatrist he must first get the permission of his state government.

In fact, every occupation above is licensed in all 50 states. That means before you go to work in those fields you have to pay whatever fees, pass whatever tests and meet whatever training, education or apprenticeship requirements your home state's professional and occupational licensing boards and commissions demand -- no matter how arbitrary, absurd or onerous they are.

Advertisement

Unfortunately, these 33 categories don't begin to show how widespread job regulation is. According to a 2007 study by the Reason Foundation, more than 1,000 occupations are regulated to some degree by states and about 20 percent of the country's work force must obtain a license to work (up from 4.5 percent in the 1950s).

The average state licenses 92 job categories, according to study author Adam Summers. California leads with 177 -- including talent agents and librarians. Missouri has the least -- 41 -- while Pennsylvania is remarkably low with 62. Among the most idiotic examples are Maryland (fortune tellers), Louisiana (florists) and Arizona (rainmakers).

Propagandists for these regulated occupations and their captive regulators in state government both insist, as Pennsylvania does, that job licenses are necessary to protect "the health, safety and welfare of the public from fraudulent and unethical practitioners."

Studies don't prove that, Summers says. And most economists -- including Milton Friedman, who shockingly but persuasively argued that "licensure should be eliminated as a requirement for the practice of medicine" -- see the scam behind the Nanny State smoke.

They know that occupational licensing is almost always a result of political lobbying by the very profession being licensed. And it is a sneaky way to use government power to protect the economic interests of incumbent doctors, lawyers and pesticide applicators.

Advertisement

By making it harder and more expensive for new doctors, lawyers and pesticide applicators to enter the market, competition and the number of practitioners in each field are artificially - and unfairly -- held down and salaries, prices and profits are propped up.

Consumers get robbed every day by this venerable public-private racket. So do those who'd like to become dietitians or auctioneers but can't afford the time or money for training or certification requirements. So does society, which gets less economic growth and innovation.

It's maddening. Because of occupational licensing, today Abe Lincoln couldn't practice law, Florence Nightingale couldn't be a nurse and Albert Einstein couldn't teach physics in a public school in America.

But don't despair. Our freedom to work isn't totally lost. Except for in Iowa, where you do need a license, any American can still grow up and become a manure applicator without getting the government's permission.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos