Criminal Leak Investigation Launched Over Iran Nuclear Damage
Trump Hits Back at Claims Iran’s Nuclear Program Wasn’t Obliterated
He Defied SCOTUS? Here’s the Judge at the Center of the Latest Judicial...
WH Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Torches CNN for Peddling Fake News Intel Report...
This Clip Perfectly Captures How NYC Might Elect a Muslim Socialist Who Thinks...
Be Prepared or Be a Serf
A War on Children?
For America to Win the AI Race, Keep Government's Hands Off
New York Times Deplores Sean Duffy's Large-Family Conspiracy
Middle East Scorecard
Skrmetti and More Transgender Cases
Recent Ukraine and Israel Attacks Are Warnings for America
The Cartel War Demands a Whole-of-Government Strategy
Senate Republicans: Remove Green Subsidies From Beautiful Bill
OPINION

Trump Accounts: An Economic Engine Disguised As a Baby Gift

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Stacie Scott/The Gazette via AP

As a mother of five children — from toddlerhood to teenage years — I think a lot about the future. Not just whether they’ll get into a good college or learn to drive safely, but whether they’ll have a shot at real financial freedom.

Advertisement

That’s why President Donald J. Trump’s Trump Accounts proposal in the One Big Beautiful Bill struck me as not just good politics but smart, forward-looking economics.

Under the president’s plan, every newborn American child would receive a $1,000 government contribution into a tax-deferred investment account. Families can contribute up to $5,000 annually, and the account would grow over time, invested in a stock index. It’s a bold step toward building an ownership society where every child has a financial stake in America’s future.

Let’s start with the basics: Compound interest is not a theory — it’s math. If a child receives $1,000 at birth and just $1,000 is added each year until age 18, assuming a modest 7% return, that account could grow to nearly $70,000 by age 30 — even if no more is added after high school.

That’s not fantasy. That’s finance.

This could be the difference between renting forever and owning a first home. It could mean starting a small business without predatory loans. It’s the kind of head start that wealthy families take for granted, now made available to every American family.

Critics argue that these accounts won’t solve poverty or that the money could be mismanaged. And I get it — I’ve sat at kitchen tables where every dollar is counted. But that’s precisely the point: This program doesn’t replace personal responsibility — it rewards it.

Families choose whether to contribute more and how to prioritize savings. It’s a voluntary, market-based tool that builds financial literacy over time. Importantly, the account belongs to the child — it’s not just another bureaucratic transfer. It’s ownership, not dependency.

Advertisement

Some economists might argue that $1,000 at birth isn’t “enough” to move the needle. However, that analysis overlooks a crucial aspect: the psychological and behavioral impact of asset-building. When families know their child has a financial future worth protecting, it can change their entire economic posture. Savings behavior increases. Hope increases. So does stability.

Yes, any system involving financial markets and public money needs guardrails. But we already manage more complex retirement and education savings programs. If we trust Americans to invest in their retirement, we can trust them to invest in their children. Of course, the elite opposes Americans having access to financial opportunities. That means they can’t control you. That also means you get to control your destiny, and every American is invested in the success of our country. 

And for families who can’t afford additional contributions? Even the base investment, when compounded, becomes a building block. We can — and should — encourage philanthropic or employer matches, state-level incentives, and even school partnerships to expand contributions. But the key is starting early.

When economists refer to “human capital,” they’re talking about the education, skills, and health of a population. Trump Accounts are a direct investment in America’s human capital that grows over time and reduces future reliance on public assistance. It’s long-term thinking in a short-term political world.

Advertisement

It’s also good news for America’s future and very bad news for the Left. The more younger generations are invested in what our country has to offer, the less likely they will subscribe to the Left’s anti-American and anti-capitalist sentiments. The Trump Accounts would give these younger Americans a stake in the game and allow them to see the potential in what our Nation uniquely offers.  

As a mom, I see a policy like this and think, finally, this is something that trusts parents, lifts families, and doesn’t require navigating a maze of red tape.

This isn’t a handout. It’s a foundation.

Let’s build an America where every child — not just the fortunate few — starts life with a stake in success. Let’s make wealth-building a possibility, not a privilege. That’s not just good for my kids. It’s good for our country.

Ashley Hayek is President of America First Works and a mom of five.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement