The Russia Hoax Reckoning
The Core of the Russian Collusion Hoax Was Just Obliterated
BRUTAL: Ex-Rolling Stone Editor Just Fact-Checked WaPo's Fact Checkers on the Russian Coll...
Apparently, It's Not Too Early to Talk About the 'I' Word
Guess Who Actually Penned a Personal Note to Jeffrey Epstein?
Teen Girl Shoots Attackers to Save Brother—Now Prosecutors Want Her Locked Up for...
Madison Shooter's Father Ordered to Stand Trial
Ninth Circuit Hands California Gun Control Major Setback
Other Biden Aides Have Invoked the Fifth, but One Spoke Candidly to Lawmakers...
This Medical Provider Will No Longer Provide Transgender Surgeries to Kids
Ron DeSantis Shuts Down Democrats’ Outrage Over Alligator Alcatraz
George Santos Heads to Prison to Begin 87-Month Sentence
Baby Born at 21 Weeks Sets World Record
What Does Trump's Border Czar Think of Ankle Monitors for Illegal Aliens?
The Sick Jihad Against the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation
Tipsheet
Premium

Chris Murphy Beclowns Himself With Anti-Gun Amendment

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

The Hearing Protection Act and SHORT Act may not have stripped suppressors and short-barreled long guns from the NFA list, but at least the tax stamp is gone. However, Sen. Chris Murphy thinks he can bring it back, and then some.

When the National Firearms Act was passed in 1934, the tax stamp cost was set at $200. That was an awful lot of money back then, and while it remained firm over the years, it was still more than anyone should have to pay in order to exercise their right to keep and bear arms.

Now, though, on those two categories of NFA items, the tax stamp is gone.

Murphy, though, has introduced an amendment to the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 that would change things well beyond where they were.

  SA 2973. Mr. MURPHY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by 
him to the bill H.R. 3944, making appropriations for military 
construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; 
which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

       At the appropriate place, insert the following:

     SEC. ___. INCREASE IN TRANSFER AND MANUFACTURING TAXES FOR 
                   FIREARMS REGULATED UNDER THE NATIONAL FIREARMS 
                   ACT.

       (a) Transfer Tax.--Subsection (a) of section 5811 of the 
     Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by section 70436(a) 
     of Public Law 119-21, is amended to read as follows:
       ``(a) Rate.--There shall be levied, collected, and paid on 
     firearms transferred a tax at the rate of $4,709 for each 
     firearm transferred.''.
       (b) Making Tax.--Section 5821(a) of the Internal Revenue 
     Code of 1986, as amended by section 70436(b) of Public Law 
     119-21, is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``$200'' and inserting 
     ``$4,709'', and
       (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``$0'' and inserting 
     ``$55''.
       (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 4182(a) of the Internal 
     Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by section 70436(c) of 
     Public Law 119-21, is amended by striking the second 
     sentence.
       (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall apply to calendar quarters beginning more than 90 days 
     after the date of the enactment of Public Law 119-21.
                                 ______

Unsurprisingly, the people at Brady are loving this proposal.

Basically, Murphy is trying to not just bring back the NFA tax stamp on suppressors and short-barreled long guns, but bring the tax stamp up to the point where it would be if it were indexed to inflation.

Yeah, not super great.

However, this is more than most anti-gun Democrats were talking about doing once they had the chance. That plan was to triple the cost of the tax stamp. What Murphy is suggesting goes well beyond that. That raises an interesting question of whether those Democrats will back this or wait until they actually have the votes to do something.

Right now, they don't.

Yes, the HPA and SHORT Act squeaked by, and not without having some unfortunate trimming take place, but they still passed. I find it very difficult to fathom lawmakers who voted for that suddenly agreeing to jacking up the cost of that same tax stamp by orders of magnitude. It's just not going to happen.

But Murphy and the anti-gun crowd are going to push it anyway, because they have to pretend they're accomplishing something in order to bilk more anti-gunners out of their money.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement