Another Anti-Trump Media Narrative Is Showing No Effect With Voters
This Poll of American Jews About Trump and Israel Makes No Sense
The WHCA Just Hamstrung Its Awards Dinner, and The Atlantic Proves Leftists Are...
This Is the Harsh Reality of Unintentional Shootings Involving Children
Stefanik Predicts Another University President’s Ouster
Trump Signs Executive Order Targeting 'Exploitive Ticket Scalping'
Senate Intel Republican: ‘SignalGate’ Does Not Show Leadership Issue With Hegseth
Remember Devon Archer and Jason Galanis? Trump Just Granted Them Clemency.
'Bloated Bureaucracy:' Why TSA May Be on the Chopping Block
Kirk Cameron’s New Show Teaches Kids ‘Clear Moral Lesson’
Another University Just Did Away With DEI
Brad Schimel vs. Susan Crawford: The Key Issues at Stake in Wisconsin’s Supreme...
Democratic Sen. Coons: 'Your Average Middle American' Is Too Stupid to Find Greenland...
Patronis Poised for Quick Impact in Congress
Markwayne Mullin Delivers Masterclass on 'Signalgate' During Sunday Show Appearance
Tipsheet
Premium

Illinois Files Intention to Appeal District Court Ruling on Gun Magazines

AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli

Last week, a district court handed Illinois a major defeat on the right to keep and bear arms. The state restricts, among other things, magazine capacity. The district court said that such a restriction is unconstitutional.

It's not, of course, but no one should be shocked to see Illinois say otherwise. It's not like the state would admit to being unconstitutional, which is probably why it did what I thought it'd do the whole time and appeal the court's decision:

Attorneys for the state of Illinois filed a notice of appeal with the federal district court that found the state’s gun and magazine ban violates the U.S. Constitution.

Illinois banned the sale and possession of more than 170 semi-automatic firearms and magazines over certain capacities in January 2023. Consolidated cases challenging the ban were heard during a bench trial in East St. Louis in September.

Southern District of Illinois federal Judge Stephen McGlynn said in his ruling Friday, the ban is “an affront to the Second Amendment and must be enjoined.”


He issued a permanent injunction against the law but held that from taking effect for 30 days.

Dan Eldridge with Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, one of the plaintiffs groups in the consolidated case, said all eyes are now on how the appeals court reacts.

“And right now the existing panel is split 50-50,” Eldridge told The Center Square.

The previous appeals court panel that handled the preliminary injunction McGlynn issued in this case in April 2023 was split 2-1 in saying the state had a likelihood of advancing on the merits.

One of the appeals judges in the majority on the previous panel, Diane Wood, has retired since their preliminary ruling in November 2023. It’s unclear with the case now decided on final judgment in the district court if there will be an entirely new panel or if another appeals judge would be assigned to the existing panel of Easterbrook and Judge Michael Brennan.  

“Also, Judge [Frank] Easterbrook left open the door for being convinced that an AR-15 is not the same thing as an M4 or an M16,” Eldrige said. “And I think we did that and I think Judge McGlynn made a powerful, a powerful argument that that’s a nonsensical standard.”

If Illinois loses in the Seventh Circuit, it will be devastating, and the state will have to weigh a couple of things if it wants to take the case further.

A circuit court ruling would kill the law. There's no way around that, but circuit court rulings generally don't apply across the nation, just in that circuit. That's important because that's as far as it goes if the state takes the loss and calls it a day.

If Illinois opts to take it to the Supreme Court instead, it could easily find magazine restrictions overturned across the nation, much like how Bruen struck down "may issue" laws for concealed carry permits. Of course, if the Court rules in its favor, future challenges will be problematic for gun rights advocates.

Of course, while the Supreme Court isn't as great as I'd like it to be on guns, the truth is that it's unlikely to find any real historical analog to magazine restrictions. The Court is unlikely to agree with Illinois about its magazine limit law.

That would kill similar laws everywhere.

That's good for gun rights advocates, but not so great for states like Illinois which seems to take guidance from New York or California.

Here's hoping Illinois keeps it up and keeps losing along the way.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement