Will AI Data Centers Cause an Eminent Domain Explosion?
John Cornyn Reverses Position on Nuking Filibuster to Pass SAVE America Act
CNN Proves False Narratives Are a Network Feature; WaPo Upset Photographers It Does...
Bombshell Federal Lawsuit Says Teachers Abused Students for Decades in Small Wisconsin Sch...
Ayatollah Khamenei Opposed His Son As His Successor As Reports Swirl He May...
The FBI Just Issued This Warning to Police Departments in California
The 3 Big Lies About the Iran War
Florida Teens Accused of Plotting to Kill Classmate to Resurrect Sandy Hook Shooter
Farm Labor Company Operator Pleads Guilty to RICO Charge in Worker Exploitation Case
Venezuelan Man Accused of Assaulting Federal Agent, Grabbing Gun During Arrest in Michigan
This Major Insurance Company Agreed to Pay $117M Over Allegedly Overcharging Medicare for...
James Carville Admits He Has 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' — Says He Prays for...
Pennsylvania Dentist Among Three Found Guilty in $30M Medicaid Fraud Conspiracy
James Talarico Quietly Deletes Endorsement Page Showcasing His Most Radical Supporters
New York Man Accused of Threatening President Trump, ICE Agents on YouTube
Tipsheet
Premium

Savannah, GA, Anti-Gun Ordinance Takes It on the Chin After Gun Rights Group Gets Involved

Savannah, GA, Anti-Gun Ordinance Takes It on the Chin After Gun Rights Group Gets Involved
AP Photo/Brittainy Newman, File

The city of Savannah, Georgia thought the state's law preempting gun control except by the General Assembly didn't really apply to them. So, they passed a gun storage ordinance that would punish people who had guns stolen from their cars.

It was nonsense and while the local media largely ignored the state's preemption law, pro-gun voices didn't. Now, the city took it on the chin after trying to prosecute someone for it.

Part of the problem was that while a defense against a city ordinance often doesn't make a lot of sense financially, it does when a gun rights group gets involved and is willing to back that defense.

SAVANNAH, GA (November 1, 2024) – Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that charges have been dropped against its member, Mr. Deacon Morris, following an FPC-backed defense against the charges that included an affirmative attack on Savannah, Georgia’s gun control ordinance. In the case, the government had been criminally prosecuting Mr. Morris for violating the city’s gun storage ordinance despite Georgia’s firearm preemption law that makes the city’s ordinance invalid. FPC’s defense of Mr. Morris was a parallel action to its Belt v. Savannah case, a civil lawsuit challenging the same ordinance.

“Governments often rely on steamrolling criminal defendants and coercive plea bargains, but Deacon Morris had excellent counsel, a strong defense, and FPC in his corner. We are delighted that Mr. Morris can finally walk away from this outrageous prosecution and we can now turn attention to our Belt v. Savannah lawsuit, which we hope will end enforcement of Savannah’s unlawful ordinance once and for all,” said FPC President Brandon Combs.

That is often true, unfortunately. They threaten and cajole people into taking deals so as to not risk worse sentences if they lose. Plus, while our system is supposedly designed to make it easier on the defense than the prosecution, there's still a massive disparity in resources, among other things.

This isn't exactly a terrible thing when dealing with an accused murderer, but when we're talking about someone being prosecuted for a law that isn't even legal, it's a big issue.

All gun control laws in Georgia have to be created by the General Assembly. It can only apply in a particular city, but the state legislature is the only entity that has the authority to do so beyond Congress itself. In theory, this doesn't preclude gun control laws, but in practice, it does. Gun control isn't happening in Georgia no matter how much the anti-gunners in Savannah want it.

But the city didn't care. They figured it was better to ask forgiveness than permission and pushed it through anyway.

The thing is, that's not how it works. 

Unfortunately, though, they're not wrong enough. What I mean is that there are no teeth to most states' preemption laws. Local officials can ignore it and while the law won't be permitted to stand, it can cause a lot of damage in the meantime and those responsible will never be held accountable directly.

Florida, however, has a law in place that allows fines for the individual lawmakers and specifies that it must come out of their own pocket, not taxpayer funds.

We need more of that.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement