It Is Right and Proper to Laugh at the Suffering of Journalists
For Epstein Victims and Members of Congress, It’s Time to Put Up or...
Axios Is Having a Tough Go of Things This Week, and Media Are...
The Decline of the Washington Post
Ingrates R’ Us
Jeffries and Schumer Denounce Trump's 'Racist' Video — but Who Are They to...
NYC Needs School Choice—Not ‘Green Schools’
Housing Affordability Is About Politics, Not Economics
Is It Cool to Be Unpatriotic? Perhaps — but It’s Also Ungrateful
A Chance Meeting With Richard Pryor — and Its Lasting Impact
What’s Next After That $2 million Detransitioner Lawsuit Win?
Focus Iran’s Future on Democracy, Not Dynasty
California Campaign Adviser Sentenced to 48 Months in PRC Agent Case
19 New York City Residents Reportedly Freeze to Death After Mamdani Changes Homeless...
Colorado Woman Allegedly Billed $400K to Medicaid for Family’s Phantom Medical Rides
Tipsheet

Former AG Bill Barr Suggests Special Counsel and Grand Jury to Probe SCOTUS Leak

Michael Reynolds/Pool via AP

In a Tuesday interview on Megyn Kelly's podcast, twice-former United States Attorney General Bill Barr responded to the unprecedented leak of a Supreme Court decision draft authored by Justice Samuel Alito that would appeal Roe v. Wade if the draft represents the Court's final decision.

Advertisement

Kelly asked Barr for his thoughts on Chief Justice John Roberts' decision to direct the Marshal of the Court to investigate the leak, and Barr suggested the Marshal's investigation may not be the only avenue that will be used to track down the party or parties responsible for breaching the integrity of the Supreme Court.

"The Chief would’ve had the option, perhaps he still will, to appoint a counsel," Barr noted. "A special counsel — not in the classical criminal sense — but the Court can appoint a counsel and bring in a former U.S. attorney or someone with a law background," he added before lending credence to other rumblings about a federal investigation saying he's "sure" Roberts would "get the support he needed from the FBI or any other law enforcement agency."

Kelly asked whether Barr thought an investigation would be able to identify and confirm the leaker, to which Barr suggested "they may need a grand jury to do that, which would mean a criminal case...to compel the truth." The need to compel truthfulness, as Barr explained, is because "perhaps" individuals being questioned would lie to the Marshal, but not to a prosecutor. 

The crime then at issue, Barr suggested, "could be obstructing the administration of justice...the due process of justice," he explained. "Obstruction means you’re attempting to influence through some kind of wrongdoing — I don’t think it’s a stretch," Barr said of the obstruction charge sticking.

Advertisement

Related:

SCOTUS

In general, Barr said the leak from the Supreme Court left him "flabbergasted." Continuing, Barr lamented the fact that "our institutions have become increasingly politicized" but said he "never imagined this could happen to the Supreme Court, which has always protected its confidentiality. For someone to let this out in order to influence the final decision is really beyond the pale," Barr added.

You can listen to the full episode of the Megyn Kelly Show discussing the SCOTUS leak below:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement