Norms Only Exist to Protect the Status Quo. Ignore Them.
There Was a Heavy Police Presence for a Reported Shooting Near a Top...
ICE Does a Triple Pick-Up of Illegals in Minnesota...and Their Crimes Are Henious
(D)ifferent Kinds of Kings
When Dissent Becomes Sabotage: The Rise of the Counter-MAGA Fifth Column
Criminals Are Stealing Billions From America’s Seniors. AARP Is Fighting Back.
Hey, Tucker: Christianity and Islam Have a Long and Very Bitter History
Disposable Democrats
The Media Exploit the Pope As Trump's Public Enemy No. 1
How Hungary Matters
When the Rules Don't Apply to the Rulers
Mamdani’s Government Grocery Store Is an Awful Idea
Why Taxpayers Should Stop Funding Planned Parenthood and Start Investing in Moms
Massachusetts School District Enters Federal Agreement to Protect Jewish Students From Har...
Indian National Convicted for Scamming 79-Year-Old Vietnam Veteran Out of Gold
Tipsheet

Psaki Admits Appealing the CDC Mandate Ruling Is All About Preserving Power

Psaki Admits Appealing the CDC Mandate Ruling Is All About Preserving Power
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

In Wednesday's White House press briefing, Jen Psaki was asked about the Biden administration's rather disjointed reaction to a federal judge in Florida striking down the CDC's mask mandate for travelers and its delayed response to the ruling — as Townhall reported earlier this week.

Advertisement

But when given the opportunity to explain and justify the Biden administration's decision to appeal the federal judge's invalidation of the CDC's federal mask mandate, Psaki admitted that the White House would fight the ruling in order to "preserve that authority for the CDC to have in the future." That is, it's not about The Science(TM), it's about protecting power. 

"We are entirely able to, and legally able to, be a part of the discussion," Psaki told reporters about the Biden administration's appeal. "But right now we of course are deferring to the CDC on what they believe is needed at this moment," she said despite the fact that the White House has repeatedly gotten in front of CDC guidance in the past. 

"They've already, they obviously put in place this two week extension because they felt they needed that to take a look at the data given that we've seen a rise in cases, so we certainly anticipate to hear more from them soon on their ask for being able to have that time which we think is entirely warranted," Psaki continued. "And the Department of Justice, as you noted, has indicated that they would appeal not just because they think it's entirely reasonable of course to have this additional time to look at it but because they think that the current, for current and future public health crises, we want to preserve that authority for the CDC to have in the future," she argued. 

Advertisement

Psaki later said the White House's focus following the federal judge's decision was "seeing what power we had to preserve what we felt was in the public health interest of the country." Again, all about power to enforce what they feel, rather than empirical evidence rooted in actual science. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement