This Is Not a Drill
President Trump Scores Another MAJOR Win
Trust the Administration on the Epstein Files and Let's Keep on Winning
Oh, No Wonder Why That WSJ Trump-Epstein Birthday Card Story Is Bogus
What Tulsi Gabbard Just Released Should Terrify Every Single American
He Threatened Marjorie Taylor Greene's Life. Now He's Facing Prison Time.
Zohran Mamdani Has a Serious 'Intifada' Problem
Illegal Immigrant Busted After Faking Immigration 'Kidnapping'
California Hits Back at Trump Administration Over Canceled High-Speed Rail Funds
Vance Responds to the Wall Street Journal's Supposed 'Bombshell' About Trump and Epstein
Yet Another Top Biden Official Just Pleaded the Fifth
Trump: I ‘Absolutely Love’ That Colbert Got Fired
Barack Obama: Men Need 'Non-Binary' Friends
Three Deputies Dead After Explosion at L.A. Sheriff’s Training Center
Maurene Comey Issues First Statement Since Her Firing
Tipsheet

Senator Kennedy Stumps Supreme Court Nominee with One Question

As Tuesday's Supreme Court confirmation hearing dragged into the evening hours, Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) raised a simple question about when constitutional protections for life — or even just life itself — begins. 

Advertisement

"When does life begin, in your opinion," Senator Kennedy asked Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson for starters.

"Senator... um... I don't... know," Judge Jackson replied, followed by an uneasy, awkward laugh. 

"Do you have a belief?" Kennedy pressed.

"I have, um, personal religious and otherwise beliefs that have nothing to do with the law in terms of when life begins," Jackson responded.

"Do you have a personal belief though about when life begins?" Kennedy probed.

"I have a religious view that I set aside when I am ruling on cases," Jackson evaded again.

Senator Kennedy pushed further on the point, asking Judge Jackson an important follow-up, "When does equal protection of the laws attach to a human being?"

"Well Senator, um... I believe that the Supreme Court... um... actually I, I actually don't know the answer to that question — I'm sorry — I don't," Judge Jackson responded, again with an ill-timed grin on her face as her initially confident answer turned to another know-nothing response.

Advertisement

How Senate Judiciary Democrats and Judge Jackson's "sherpa" — former Senator Doug Jones (D-AL) — apparently failed to prepare her to answer questions relating to the debate over life displays either arrogance that Jackson's answers don't matter to the outcome of the confirmation vote or ignorance that such questions might arise.

With the Supreme Court set to rule in the near future on one of the most significant challenges to Roe v. Wade in a generation and the issue of life being a long-running priority for Republicans in the Senate, it is absurd to think Judge Jackson's team would assume questions on the topic wouldn't arrive. Yet, it doesn't seem Jackson has given the issue much thought. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement