The Trump White House Is Letting Its Attack Dog Off the Leash for...
Scott Jennings Had a Sensible Take on the New Anti-Weaponization Fund on CNN....
Trump Dropped a Great Response When Asked This Question About Mark Cuban
NBC News Is Worried a Chinese Agent Getting Busted Could Cause a Racial...
Panicans Are Learning a Brutal Lesson Regarding Defying Trump: Get in Line or...
Knicks Fan Sent a Philly Reporter Flowers With This Hilarious Note. Yes, We're...
These Luigi Mangione Fans Are Sick, But It Sort of Aligns With the...
Decline Is a Choice and We Don't Have to Tolerate It
Can Wisconsin Sheriffs Honor ICE Detainers? The State Supreme Court Is About to...
A Chicago Woman Just Humiliated Democrats Over Their Faux Voting Rights Outrage
Another Wildfire Is Ripping Through Southern California
Two American Tourists Were Arrested for Alleged Monkey Business in Japan
A Judge Barred Release of GA Supreme Court Candidates' Misconduct Allegations. Here's Why...
Nakba Forever
Make America Florida
Tipsheet

The New York Times Makes A Stunning Admission About CDC Data On Vaccines

The New York Times Makes A Stunning Admission About CDC Data On Vaccines
Stefani Reynolds/The New York Times via AP, Pool

The New York Times made an eye-popping admission on Sunday regarding data collected by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) on Covid-19 vaccines.

In an article titled, "The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects," reporter Apoorva Mandavilli writes: "For more than a year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has collected data on hospitalizations for Covid-19 in the United States and broken it down by age, race and vaccination status. But it has not made most of the information public."

Advertisement

Mandavilli, who covers science and global health for the Times, reported that the agency has published "only a tiny fraction of the data it has collected" since the pandemic began, including data on booster efficacy for 18 - 49 year-olds, a tremendous chunk of the U.S. population.

Reasons listed include bureaucracy, sample size, and not being "ready for prime time," but one that's definitely set to raise lots of eyebrows is the claim that the data could be "misinterpreted" by Covid vaccine skeptics. 

From the report:

Last year, the agency repeatedly came under fire for not tracking so-called breakthrough infections in vaccinated Americans, and focusing only on individuals who became ill enough to be hospitalized or die. The agency presented that information as risk comparisons with unvaccinated adults, rather than provide timely snapshots of hospitalized patients stratified by age, sex, race and vaccination status.

But the C.D.C. has been routinely collecting information since the Covid vaccines were first rolled out last year, according to a federal official familiar with the effort. The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public, the official said, because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective.

Advertisement

Instead, health experts have been forced to rely on data from Israel and elsewhere to make decisions, the Times reported.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement