Erika Kirk's Powerful Address to the Nation
Do You Agree With Bill Maher's Take on Charlie Kirk's Assassination?
Conservatives Must Continue Speaking Out, Even As the Left Demands We Censor 'Objectionabl...
DOJ Declares School Dissent Protected Under First Amendment
'We Are Charlie Kirk!' South Koreans Take to the Streets in Global Show...
Co-CEO of Chinese Technology Company and Financial Advisor Indicted for Over $100M Securit...
Democrat Rhetoric Under Fire After Charlie Kirk Assassination
Parents Gifted Charlie Kirk Assassin a 'Build-Your-Own Gun' Kit for Christmas
Michigan Office Depot Refuses to Print Charlie Kirk Vigil Posters
Man Arrested for Illegally Entering Charlie Kirk Crime Scene, Taking Photos
Jasmine Crockett Defends Comparing Trump to Hitler, Dismisses Concerns Over Left-Wing Inci...
CBS Reporter Uses Charlie Kirk’s Death to Push Anti-Police Narrative
House Republicans Demand Investigation Into Left-Wing Networks After Charlie Kirk Assassin...
White House Honors Charlie Kirk with Tribute Video Highlighting Faith and Patriotism
Charlie Kirk Assassin Lived With Transgender Partner
Tipsheet

The New York Times Makes A Stunning Admission About CDC Data On Vaccines

Stefani Reynolds/The New York Times via AP, Pool

The New York Times made an eye-popping admission on Sunday regarding data collected by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) on Covid-19 vaccines.

In an article titled, "The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects," reporter Apoorva Mandavilli writes: "For more than a year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has collected data on hospitalizations for Covid-19 in the United States and broken it down by age, race and vaccination status. But it has not made most of the information public."

Advertisement

Mandavilli, who covers science and global health for the Times, reported that the agency has published "only a tiny fraction of the data it has collected" since the pandemic began, including data on booster efficacy for 18 - 49 year-olds, a tremendous chunk of the U.S. population.

Reasons listed include bureaucracy, sample size, and not being "ready for prime time," but one that's definitely set to raise lots of eyebrows is the claim that the data could be "misinterpreted" by Covid vaccine skeptics. 

From the report:

Last year, the agency repeatedly came under fire for not tracking so-called breakthrough infections in vaccinated Americans, and focusing only on individuals who became ill enough to be hospitalized or die. The agency presented that information as risk comparisons with unvaccinated adults, rather than provide timely snapshots of hospitalized patients stratified by age, sex, race and vaccination status.

But the C.D.C. has been routinely collecting information since the Covid vaccines were first rolled out last year, according to a federal official familiar with the effort. The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public, the official said, because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective.

Advertisement

Instead, health experts have been forced to rely on data from Israel and elsewhere to make decisions, the Times reported.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement