Is the New Supreme Leader Already Dead?
Stelter Hung Out to Dry a Second Time This week – Says Network...
Progressive Crackpots Vs. Environmental Wackos
The Morality of Taxation
Healthcare Is Not a Right, Nor Should the Government Guarantee It
The Road to Tehran Runs Through Baku
The Parent-Led Rebellion Against EdTech
It’s Time to Build America With U.S.-Made Materials
DEI Is Dead. Corporate America Just Hasn’t Admitted It Yet.
Affordability Is Not a Slogan. Democrats Treat It Like One.
From Panic to Therapy: Cycle of Faux Climate Fear
President Donald J. Trump Can Index Capital Gains With Pen
The Unbearable Lightness of Being Gavin Newsom
The First Time in my Life That I Have Come into Conflict With...
Temple Israel Terrorist Died of Self-Inflicted Wound, Stuffed Truck With Accelerant and Fi...
Tipsheet

5th Circuit Vacates Ruling That Blocked Louisiana's Mandate to Display 10 Commandments in Schools

5th Circuit Vacates Ruling That Blocked Louisiana's Mandate to Display 10 Commandments in Schools
Paul Hellstern/The Oklahoman via AP

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a lower court’s decision that blocked Louisiana's mandate to hang the 10 Commandments in classrooms. 

Louisiana House Bill 71 requires public schools to display the 10 Commandments in every classroom.  A group of parents sued to challenge the law. They claimed that the rule is unconstitutional under the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment. 

Advertisement

A district court granted a preliminary injunction and found the case ripe for a ruling. Another panel affirmed the ruling and the 5th Circuit voted to rehear the case en banc, meaning that all judges on the court hear the case instead of a small panel. It vacated the ruling. 

“Because the parents’ challenge turns on unresolved factual and contextual questions, equitable relief was premature, and we VACATE the preliminary injunction,” the ruling reads. 

The 5th Circuit of Appeals found that the previous panel ruled incorrectly. 

“The panel’s unduly cramped reading of Staley—limiting it to cases in which literally no aspect of a future display is known—does precisely that," the ruling said. "Properly understood, Staley does not turn on whether some details of a future display are known, but on whether courts can evaluate constitutionality without resorting to conjecture. There, the challenged monument was known in considerable detail.”

The ruling continued: 

“But an unripe challenge does not become ripe merely because a party asserts that the challenged action would be unlawful on any conceivable set of facts.”

Advertisement

Read the 46-page ruling below. 


 La 10 Commandments  by  scott.mcclallen 

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement