The Strong Case Against Don Lemon
Slouching Toward Fort Sumter?
‘Masks Off, Cameras On’: Congress Battles Over ICE Reforms
This County Is Suing the Trump Administration After the FBI Seized Election Records
Marjorie Taylor Greene Attacks MAGA, Says It 'Was All a Lie'
This Harry Potter Star Just Called J.K. Rowling's Trans Views 'Inexplicable'
'Today' Host Savannah Guthrie's Mother Reported Missing in Arizona. Here's What We Know.
Sportscaster Emily Austin Proved Not Everyone at the Grammys Hated ICE
New Yorkers Are Learning the 'Warmth of Collectivism' Is a Big Pile of...
Rep. Jayapal Seems to Think Democrats Will Abolish ICE If They Get the...
Here's How a Wisconsin School Thought Best to Solve the Transgender Bathroom Issue
The Grammys: Supporting Rapists!
This New Vogue Article Just Can’t Stop Gushing Over Gavin Newsom
Trump Threatens to Sue Michael Wolff, Epstein Estate After the Latest Epstein Files...
Leavitt Blasts This GOP Senator For Holding the Economy Hostage, Vowing to Oppose...
Tipsheet
Premium

ABC News Under Fire for Framing SNAP Fraud Suspects as 'Massachusetts Men'

AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough

ABC News is under fire for blaming two “Massachusetts men” for running a $7 million SNAP fraud ring selling benefits meant for hungry families.

The men, Antonio Bonheur, 74, and Saul Alisme, 21, were each charged with one count of food stamp fraud. Bonheur is a naturalized U.S. citizen and Alisme is a lawful permanent resident and citizen of Haiti, according to the charging documents.




The men sold benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for cash, liquor, and more, according to court documents. That federal program feeds about 42 million people monthly. 

Bonheur's store was only 150 square feet of space, but he reported monthly SNAP redemptions ranging from $100,000 to $500,000.

By comparison, one full-service supermarket in the same area redeems approximately $82,000 per month in SNAP benefits.

The stores each had one register, no shopping carts, and no baskets. It couldn’t have supported the reported sales numbers, the charging documents said. Investigators surveilled the properties and found that repeatedly large transactions were occurring at the stores but people were leaving the stores sometimes with no merchandise or bags visible at all, even after spending hundreds of dollars in SNAP EBT transactions.


Additionally, transaction-level data showed that only approximately 10 percent of SNAP transactions were for amounts under $40, while more than 70 percent of transactions exceeded $95. Such transaction patterns are typically associated with large supermarkets, not small variety stores with limited food inventory.

During undercover operations conducted at both businesses over the course of the investigation, SNAP benefits were allegedly trafficked for cash on four occasions from Jesula Variety Store and on two occasions from Saul Mache Mixe Store. In each instance, the defendants themselves allegedly worked the cash registers and personally exchanged SNAP benefits for cash.

 Both stores were also allegedly observed selling liquor in exchange for SNAP benefits.

Court documents say that both stores sold MannaPack meals, a donated food product manufactured by the nonprofit Feed My Starving Children that are meant to feed hungry kids, not for retail.

The defendants allegedly sold donated MannaPack meals in their stores for approximately $8 per package, profiting from food intended for humanitarian relief.

According to the charging documents, because both stores carried little legitimate food inventory and generated minimal lawful revenue, the defendants allegedly relied almost entirely on United States Department of Agriculture-funded SNAP redemptions as their source of income. 

The two men allegedly kept multiple secondary bank accounts to route SNAP payments through that appeared to be a legitimate business. 

The charge of food stamp fraud greater than $100 provides for a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement