Trans Athlete at the Center of Washington Wrestling Controversy Withdraws From State Tourn...
Gavin Newsom Is Getting Dragged for Not Knowing What Illiterate Means...and It's Pretty...
Look What the Rhode Island Hockey Rink Shooter Posted on X Before the...
And That, My Dear Children, Is Why the GOP Keeps Losing...
Lie-a-Watha Strikes Again! Elizabeth Warren Doesn't Tell the Truth About Tesla Paying Taxe...
This Chinese Olympic Traitor Failed to Win Gold in Italy
Democrats' Dogged Defense of Islam
Check Out This Poetry Eric Swalwell Penned in College
Did You See How the Left Is Spinning the Death of a...
CBS Pulled the Plug on Stephen Colbert's Interview With James Talarico. Here's Why.
Civil Rights Activist Rev. Jesse Jackson Dies Aged 84
Why So Much Faith in Politics?
Seventh Inning Stretcher
Allegations of Antisemitism Against the Heritage Foundation Are Baseless
Newsom’s $450 Million 911 Debacle Reminds Why We Oppose Federal Welfare
Tipsheet

Texas Judge Writes Scathing Dissent in Texas Redistricting Ruling

Texas Judge Writes Scathing Dissent in Texas Redistricting Ruling
AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli

This week, a panel of three federal judges in the Western District of Texas struck down Texas’s proposed redistricting maps.

The panel ruled 2-1. If the ruling stands, then Texas must use redistricting maps from 2021. 

Advertisement

Circuit Judge Jerry E. Smith wrote a scathing 104-page dissent. Smith accused U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Vincent Brown of "pernicious judicial misbehavior." Smith claimed that the ruling was a byproduct of "judicial activism."


 Texas  by  scott.mcclallen 


“In 37 years as a federal judge, I’ve served on hundreds of three-judge panels," Smith wrote. "This is the most blatant exercise of judicial activism that I have ever witnessed.” 

Advertisement

He later continued:  “The main winners from Judge Brown’s opinion are George Soros and Gavin Newsom. The obvious losers are the People of Texas and the Rule of Law.” 

In November, California voters passed Proposal 50, which aims to give Democrats more seats in the U.S. House. The Department of Justice has sued and asked a court to toss the proposal. The lawsuit claims that the California redistricting maps use race as a proxy to advance political interests.

Advertisement

Both parties are trying to gain an advantage in the U.S House. President Trump has called on Indiana Republicans to redistrict the state and add two more Republican seats, but it's unclear if Indiana lawmakers have the votes. Republicans currently hold majorities in the House and Senate. 

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos