And With That Development, the Dems’ Latest Trump-Epstein Stunt Has Imploded
Trump Did Not Just Say *That* to the Syrian President
Kash Patel Just Made an Announcement That Will Make the Drug Cartels Nervous
Obamacare Didn't Fail — It's Working Exactly As Intended
Report: Tammy Duckworth Staffer Allegedly Posed As Lawyer to Help Free Illegal Immigrant...
Kansas Arrest Should Raise Red Flags for Election Security Everywhere
The Growing Isolation of John Fetterman Reveals the Democrats’ War on Moderates
Federal Judge Orders Trump to Release Hundreds of Arrested Illegal immigrants
Newsom's Former Chief of Staff Arrested by the FBI
Newsom Silent on UC Berkeley TPUSA Riot While He Attends UN Climate Summit...
Guess How Many CA Drivers Licenses Were Illegally Issued to Foreigners?
Winning America’s Future Through Energy and Innovation
Illegal Immigrant Arrested for Stealing Texas Child's Identity
Larry Kudlow Says Trump Derangement Syndrome, Not Health Care, Fuels Federal Shutdown
MS-13 Killers Face Life in Prison After Guilty Verdicts in 6 Murders
Tipsheet

Wisconsin Youth Sue State Over Climate Change

AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin

A group of young state residents have sued Wisconsin for its use of fossil fuels. 

The lawsuit filed on August 22 in the Circuit Court of Dane County, Wisconsin targets the Public Service Commission and the state legislature. 

Advertisement

The kids are ages 8 to 17 are represented by Our Children’s Trust and Midwest Environmental Advocates. 

The lawsuit challenges Wisconsin laws that prohibit the Public Service Commission from considering climate and air pollution when considering whether to approve new fossil fuel power plants. It aims to prohibit the PSC from requiring utilities to increase the amount of electricity they get from clean, renewable sources. 

The lawsuit claims that air pollution and extreme weather caused by climate change have violated the group's constitutional rights to life and liberty. 

Wisconsin must protect its waterways for public use under the Public Trust Doctrine, the lawsuit said. It claims that the government facilitates this harm through laws enacted by the Legislature and enforced by the PSC. 

 Dunn v PSC Complaint 8.22.25  by  scott.mcclallen 


The 15 plaintiffs claim to have experienced harm from what they claim is related to climate change. These so-called injuries include asthma and respiratory illness, flooding, mental health trauma, extreme weather events, the inability to access traditional tribal foods like wild rice, and loss of access to lakes and rivers central to recreation, culture, and family life. 

Advertisement

The lawsuit asks the court to declare the challenged statutes unconstitutional under the Wisconsin Constitution. 

It seeks for the court to prohibit the PSC from enforcing those statutes, restoring its ability to consider air pollution and climate impacts, and deny permits for new fossil fuel power plants. 

It wants to require that more electricity come from renewable sources so that the state can decarbonize its electricity sector - often called "net zero." But the state consumes almost six times as much energy as the state produces, according to the EIA. In 2023, renewable resources provided 9% of Wisconsin's in-state electricity net generation. 

In 2023, natural gas fueled 43% of the state's total net electricity generation, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Coal contributed 32% of the state’s total electricity net generation, down from 50% in 2018. The Point Beach nuclear power plant supplied about 15% of the state's net generation in 2023.

This month, a South Carolina Judge dismissed a lawsuit with prejudice brought against 24 oil companies.

Advertisement

“Under Plaintiff’s theory, virtually anyone could be a plaintiff – and a defendant – in what would effectively amount to a perpetual series of lawsuits that reset after every storm,” he wrote.  

The lawsuit blamed the oil companies for climate change. 

“If these lawsuits were successful, municipalities, companies, and individuals across the country could bring suits for injuries after every weather event,” the judge wrote. “The list of potential plaintiffs is unbounded. Moreover, under Plaintiff’s theory, there is no reason to limit the universe of potential defendants to energy companies alone.”


Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement