That Infamous OnlyFans Competition Led to a Pregnancy...and This Tweet Summed It Up...
BREAKING: Senate Votes to Confirm Kash Patel As FBI Director
A FEMA Tragedy You May Never Hear About
Judge Orders Local Newspaper to Take Down Editorial Criticizing City Council
Authorities Foil Planned 'Mass Casualty Attack' at High School After Discovering Disturbin...
Did You See How Hamas Returned the Remains of the Murdered Bibas Children?
California City's Freak-Out Over Gun Store a Second Amendment Infringement
Collins Explains How She Plans to Vote on Kash Patel's Nomination to Be...
Dem's Explanation for Trump's Approval Rating Shows the Party Has Learned Nothing From...
Trump Signs Executive Order Ending the 'Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders'
Yet Another Attempted Car Ramming Attack by an Islamist
Mitch McConnell Will Not Seek Reelection
Here’s What Delta Is Offering the Passengers of the Toronto Plane Crash
Trend: Around the Western World, Are Young People Drifting Rightward?
Kamala Harris Just Signed With a Talent Agency
Tipsheet

Judge Rejects Democrat-Led Effort to Stop DOGE Access

Photo/Alex Brandon

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has blocked an attempt to stop the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) mass firings and the restrictions on federal data access. This ruling comes as the Trump administration faces increasing opposition from bureaucrats concerned about transparency and the downsizing of government agencies. This latest legal battle further intensifies the ongoing debate over the future of government efficiency reforms under the Trump administration. 

Advertisement

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected an emergency appeal from 14 Democratic-led states seeking to block cost-reduction measures and prevent DOGE from proceeding with its restructuring plans. The states had requested a temporary restraining order, but the judge ruled against the motion, allowing the administration’s efforts to continue unimpeded. 

“Plaintiffs legitimately call into question what appears to be the unchecked authority of an unelected individual and an entity that was not created by Congress and over which it has no oversight,” she said. “In these circumstances, it must be indisputable that this court acts within the bounds of its authority. Accordingly, it cannot issue a TRO, especially one as wide-ranging as the Plaintiff's request, without clear evidence of imminent, irreparable harm to these Plaintiffs. The current record does not meet that standard.” 

She argued that the plaintiffs failed to meet the “high standard for irreparable injury.” She noted that their claims were based on media reports speculating on potential financial or programmatic harm if DOGE continues its aggressive restructuring. She likened this to Musk’s previous description of USAID as going through a “woodchipper.” 

Advertisement

New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez initially filed the lawsuit. He asserted, "There is no greater threat to democracy than the accumulation of state power in the hands of a single, unelected individual.” 

The lawsuit also involved attorney generals from Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement