Democrats Are Really Going with 'Graham Platner Was Too Stupid to Know What...
Chris Cuomo on the Dems' Latest Line for the Schumer Shutdown: They're Lying
Oh, Maine Dem Senate Candidate Also Trained With an Antifa-like Rifle Group?
Dem Who Said the Quiet Part Out Loud About the Schumer Shutdown Now...
Yes, a Hunting Stand Was Found With a Clear Sight Line to Trump's...
Texas Dem Suggests She’ll Slash Republicans in the Throat If They Try to...
Another Deadly Crash Tied to Gavin Newsom’s DMV: Illegal Immigrant Trucker Kills Three...
Inflation Smashes Economists Expectations in September As Prices Hold Steady and Wages Ros...
'Sophia Strong': 12-Year-Old Annunciation Shooting Survivor Finally Returns Home After Mir...
Schumer Shutdown: Democrats Block Pay to Use Pain As Political Leverage While Donor...
Following Day Long Demonstration, Coast Guard Security Opened Fire on U-Haul Driver Outsid...
NYC Mayoral Frontrunner Zohran Mamdani Linked Again to Anti-LGBTQ Figures — This Time...
Nobody Asked for This: The IRS’s Plan to Take Over Tax Filing
With China and Trade, America Is Winning Again
'Gates of Hell?' More Like a House of Cards: Iran’s Bluster Does Not...
Tipsheet

Senate Panel Secretly Investigates Allegations Against Pete Hegseth, Demands More Information

AP Photo/Rod Lamkey, Jr.

President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth’s confirmation remains in jeopardy as the Senate panel quietly seeks additional information following damning sexual misconduct allegations made against him in 2017. The former Fox News host is now facing heightened scrutiny after new details emerged, prompting further investigation into his background and jeopardizing his chance to work alongside Trump. While Hegseth’s supporters argue that the accusations are baseless, the Senate committee’s decision to request more information signals that his confirmation could be far from certain, with some members voicing concerns over the potential implications of the allegations. As the confirmation process unfolds, all eyes are on the Senate panel’s next steps in a contentious and closely watched event.

Advertisement

According to communications, the Senate Armed Services Committee’s Secretary of Defense committee leaders, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.),  are requesting to view documents from the Monterey County District Attorney's Office and Concerned Veterans for America, a group Hegseth previously led. They have also asked for more information regarding Hegseth’s financial records and tax returns relating to his time as CEO of Concerned Veterans for America. 

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), who is also part of the committee, wrote a letter saying that "in light of recent reports," he is asking "that prior to scheduling any confirmation hearing, the Committee ensure that Concerned Veterans of America (CVA) and the Veterans for Freedom (VFF) preserve and produce all financial records and correspondence, particularly concerning credit card transactions, relating to Peter Hegseth's tenure at these organizations to the Committee for review."

The allegations against Hegseth have created a serious hurdle for him, as he can afford to lose only the votes of three Senate Republicans when his confirmation comes up for a vote in the coming weeks. With pressure mounting from Republicans and Democrats, the accusations have given GOP senators pause. As the confirmation vote looms, many wonder whether the allegations, that have no sound evidence, will cost him the support he needs to secure the position. 

Hegseth has until Jan. 6 to provide the requested documents to the Senate Armed Services Committee, just over a week before his public confirmation hearing on Jan. 14.

Advertisement

A 2017 police report says that an unidentified woman has claimed she was sexually assaulted after meeting Hegseth at a hotel bar in California. However, Hegseth has denied such accusations and has insisted that the encounter was consensual. No charges were filed, and Hegseth has vehemently defended his character, calling the claims unfounded. There is no additional evidence of the woman’s claim other than the report. 

Hegseth paid the woman as part of a settlement agreement, which he says was only done so out of fear his career would be ruined if her allegations were made public. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement