Pardon Me … and You, and Everybody
These Franklin the Turtle Memes Are Outrageous...and Patriots Should Create More of Them
Disparate Impact
The WaPo Hegseth War Crime Claims Are Blasted Like a Drug Boat by...
Rein in the Universities or Lose It All
Matt Van Epps Clinches Victory in Tennessee’s 7th District Special Election
DOT Audit Finds One-Third of Minnesota’s Non-Domiciled CDLs Were Issued Illegally
Children's Book Publisher Furious that Franklin the Turtle is Fighting Narco Terrorism
Trump Officially Nullifies All Biden-Era Autopen Pardons
Journalists Can Promote 'Sedition' When It's 'ICE Resistance'
Let's Fix Our Broken Health Care System
How Many Terrorists Came From Afghanistan to America?
The App Store Freedom Act: Restoring American Values in the Digital Age
Reagan Warned Us About Media Power. We Should Listen.
The End of Migration
Tipsheet

Arizona Federal Judge Rules Voters Must Prove Their U.S. Citizenship Status In Order to Vote In Elections

An Arizona federal judge is upholding a state law that requires voters to provide verification of their U.S. citizenship before their votes can be counted. 

Advertisement

Following a lawsuit that led to Arizona legislators facing accusations of discrimination for requiring voters to verify their U.S. citizenship, Judge Susan Bolton ruled on Thursday that such requirements were not discriminatory. 

In March 2022, a group of plaintiffs led by the Hispanic voting rights organization “Mi Familia Vota” filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, claiming that the state’s law was unconstitutional. 

The Biden Administration filed a separate complaint that was consolidated in the case. 

The plaintiffs argued that H.B. 2492 was a “baseless assault on Arizona’s election system based on a conspiracy theory that non-citizens are voting, despite a persistent lack of credible evidence to support such claim.” They added that it was “cynical” and of “bad faith” to use the “politically motivated and false allegations” to restrict people from voting in U.S. elections. 

However, Bolton argued that Arizona has an interest in preventing voter fraud as the 2024 presidential election nears. 

“Plaintiffs have not carried their burden to show that the Voting Laws’ remaining citizenship investigation procedures, [documentary proof of citizenship] requirements, and registration cancellation procedures violate the [National Voter Registration Act] or the [Voting Rights Act],” Bolton wrote in her ruling. “Nor do these provisions impose an undue burden on the right to vote or violate the equal protection and due process guarantees of the U.S. Constitution. Finally, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs failed to show that the Voting Laws were enacted with any discriminatory purpose.” 

“Considering the evidence as a whole, the court concludes that Arizona’s interests in preventing non-citizens from voting and promoting public confidence in Arizona’s elections outweigh the limited burden voters might encounter when required to provide (documentary proof of citizenship),” her ruling continued.

Advertisement

Related:

VOTER FRAUD

With millions of illegal migrants entering the U.S. through President Joe Biden’s open southern border and Arizona being considered a crucial battleground state in the presidential election, Bolton’s ruling is one step closer to putting a stop to the Left’s radical policies. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos