Here Are the Final Details Between Colombia and the US Over Deportation Flights
If It Wasn't on HBO, ESPN's Stephen A. Smith Wouldn't Be Invited Back...
The Manic Buckshot Presidency
WH Hails Capturing Top Illegal Immigrant Criminals and It's Monumental
How RFK Jr. Plans to Tackle the Opioid Crisis
Trump Releases Weapons Biden Withheld From Israel
NYC Sees First Five-Day Period in 30 Years With No Shooting Victims
Federal Worker Slams Trump’s Executive Order: 'It’s Making My Job Harder'
How JD Vance Was the Man Behind the J6 Pardons
JD Vance's First Interview as VP Is Brilliant
UPDATE: Colombia President Backs Down After Trump Threatens Nation for Rejecting Deportati...
Under Trump’s 'One Flag Policy,' Only Old Glory Takes the Spotlight
Trump Brings Back Mexico City Policy
Bishop Who Rebuked Trump During National Prayer Launches Liberal Media Blitz
Trump Keeps Major Campaign Trail Promise
Tipsheet

NYT Finally Admits Masks Did Nothing

AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis

Nearly three years since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic and woke liberals pushing the need for a mask down people's throats, Left-wing New York Times finally admits that wearing a face covering did nothing. 

Advertisement

The article "The Mask Mandates Did Nothing. Will Any Lessons Be Learned?" by columnist Bret Stephens dives into studies conducted on the efficacy of masks. 

After examining the studies closely, Stephens admitted that no hard evidence proves face coverings help decrease the spread of the virus. 

"The most rigorous and comprehensive analysis of scientific studies conducted on the efficacy of masks for reducing the spread of respiratory illnesses — including Covid-19 — was published late last month. Its conclusions, said Tom Jefferson, the Oxford epidemiologist who is its lead author, were unambiguous," Stephens wrote. 

Jefferson, interviewed by journalist Maryanne Demasi, said that masks, not even the infamous N-95 masks, make no difference. 

But what about all those "studies" done claiming that wearing a mask will "save lives," giving politicians the power to mandate one to be in public? 

"They were convinced by non-randomized studies, flawed observational studies," Jefferson replied. 

He continued to say that using masks combined with other preventive measures, such as hand hygiene, physical distancing, and air filtration, still makes no difference in how Covid spreads. 

Advertisement

"Mask mandates were a fool's errand from the start," Stephens wrote, adding, "they may have created a false sense of safety — and thus permission to resume semi-normal life. They did almost nothing to advance safety itself. The Cochrane report ought to be the final nail in this particular coffin."

However, the op-ed sparked controversy among political commentators, arguing that masks didn't do anything for the people's well-being. 

"While it's nice to see the NY Times finally admit masks are worthless, it's false to say the mandates 'did nothing,'" Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon wrote, adding "they harmed kids, eroded public trust, and psychologically damaged millions of people to the point where they're still afraid to breathe in public."

Advertisement

Podcast host Kyle Becker criticized those who condemned him for saying the same thing Stephens wrote in his op-ed. 

"Natural immunity is as good as vaccinated immunity. Now, masks are 'worthless.' I'm old enough to remember when I was smeared as spreading 'misinformation' for saying the same things years ago," Becker tweeted. 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement