Living in the Lib Bubble Makes Them Lose
We Knew the LA Mayor's Results Wouldn't Be Called, but These Drunk Pratt...
Bureaucrats in the Way
The Collapse Was Not an Accident
Difficult Freedom or Easy Tyranny: Which Will America Choose?
A Mouthful of Deception
Ali Velshi's 'Deep Unease' Over America at 250
Voters Must Know Every Democrat Sent to Washington Will Hurt Our Country
Driving People Out of California
Playing With Fire – Tehran's Deadly Gambit As Economic Collapse Looms
Europe Needs Patriotism
When Businesses Leave, They Likely Won’t Be Back
Biden's Privacy Panic: 50 Years on the Taxpayer Payroll, Now Suddenly Shy About...
SCOTUS Allows Alabama's New Congressional Map to Stay in Place
Can We Stop Giving Influencers Everything Just Because They're Famous?
Tipsheet

Did You See the Indicted Wisconsin Judge's Defense?

Did You See the Indicted Wisconsin Judge's Defense?
AP Photo/Devi Shastri

Judge Hannah Dugan, the Milwaukee judge who was arrested last month after she allegedly hid an illegal immigrant in her courthouse, was indicted by a grand jury earlier this week. She's still in the news, though, given the laughable defense she's come up with. In covering Dugan's defense, Bonchie at our sister site aptly pointed out that what her lawyers are arguing "Will Crack You Up."

Advertisement

As WISN, a local ABC News outlet covered:

A day after a grand jury indicted Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan and her attorney are asking that her federal charges be dismissed, arguing the charges are unconstitutional, citing her judicial immunity and the Tenth Amendment.

...

"The problems with this prosecution are legion, but most immediately, the government cannot prosecute Judge Dugan because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts," her attorneys argued in the motion.

Dugan is accused of helping an undocumented immigrant evade federal immigration officials after appearing in her courtroom.

Dugan was not acting in her official capacity, though. Judicial immunity ought not to apply. If it turns out she is guilty, she was almost certainly abusing her power as a judge, and it looks like she's further standing by that with such a legal defense. 

Professor Jonathan Turley shared with Fox News that he doesn't see a use for such a legal theory. 

Just as it was worth doing at the time when Dugan was first arrested, it's worth issuing a key reminder to those who have been clamoring to defend the judge while ranting and raving about the Trump administration. Many of these same people were quick to tell you that nobody is above the law. 

Advertisement

Related:

RULE OF LAW

Turley also put out a blog post about Dugan's indictment, reminding how Democrats fawned over her and her alleged crimes. 

Dugan faces up to six years in prison and a maximum fine of up to $350,000 if she's found guilty. She entered a "not guilty" plea earlier on Thursday. A trial date has been set for July 21. 

Editor's Note: Every single day, here at Townhall, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its major wins. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement