BREAKING: Trump's Rescissions Package Approved by Congress
The Reactions to the WSJ's Trainwreck Trump-Epstein Story Are Hilarious
How This GOP Senator Reacted to the Dems' Tantrum on the Judiciary Committee...
The World Woke Up
Intersectional Communist Zohran Mamdani Shows Democrats Can't Quit Obamaism
Rigs to Reef: A Conservation Program Environmentalists Shouldn't Oppose
Regarding the Jeffrey Epstein Matter
The Arrogant Media Are Not 'Bringing Us Closer Together'
The Pundit and the Pervert
Higher Education in Trouble: Political Repercussions
Trump's First Six Months: Delivering Results, Defying the Left's Dire Predictions
The House Should Pass the GENIUS Act
Subversion From Within
President Trump Directs AG Bondi to Release Relevant Grand Jury Transcripts in Epstein...
Trump Slams WSJ Over Hit Piece, Calls It a ‘Disgusting and Filthy Rag’
Tipsheet

Did You See the Indicted Wisconsin Judge's Defense?

AP Photo/Devi Shastri

Judge Hannah Dugan, the Milwaukee judge who was arrested last month after she allegedly hid an illegal immigrant in her courthouse, was indicted by a grand jury earlier this week. She's still in the news, though, given the laughable defense she's come up with. In covering Dugan's defense, Bonchie at our sister site aptly pointed out that what her lawyers are arguing "Will Crack You Up."

Advertisement

As WISN, a local ABC News outlet covered:

A day after a grand jury indicted Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan and her attorney are asking that her federal charges be dismissed, arguing the charges are unconstitutional, citing her judicial immunity and the Tenth Amendment.

...

"The problems with this prosecution are legion, but most immediately, the government cannot prosecute Judge Dugan because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts," her attorneys argued in the motion.

Dugan is accused of helping an undocumented immigrant evade federal immigration officials after appearing in her courtroom.

Dugan was not acting in her official capacity, though. Judicial immunity ought not to apply. If it turns out she is guilty, she was almost certainly abusing her power as a judge, and it looks like she's further standing by that with such a legal defense. 

Professor Jonathan Turley shared with Fox News that he doesn't see a use for such a legal theory. 

Just as it was worth doing at the time when Dugan was first arrested, it's worth issuing a key reminder to those who have been clamoring to defend the judge while ranting and raving about the Trump administration. Many of these same people were quick to tell you that nobody is above the law. 

Advertisement

Turley also put out a blog post about Dugan's indictment, reminding how Democrats fawned over her and her alleged crimes. 

Dugan faces up to six years in prison and a maximum fine of up to $350,000 if she's found guilty. She entered a "not guilty" plea earlier on Thursday. A trial date has been set for July 21. 

Editor's Note: Every single day, here at Townhall, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its major wins. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement