This Is Why Trump Is Sending the Feds to Chicago
Bill Maher Nails Why Trump Connects With Voters...and Dems Won't Like It
CNN Host: There's No Evidence That Obama or Biden Went After Trump
Virginia Dems Might Want to Correct This Statement Over the Sign That Attacked...
So, That's Why the University of South Carolina Had an Active Shooter Alert
All the Right People in Media Were Mad About John Bolton's Home Being...
Democrats Seem To Love Black Death
And Stay Out!
There's Been a Major Update Regarding Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Trump Wants Grassley to Tell Dems These Three Words Over 'Blue Slip' Tradition
A Disturbing Number of People Have Signed Petition Supporting Illegal Trucker Accused of...
The Woke Left Goes Lock, Stock, and Cracker Barrel
When 'Woke' Businesses Betray Their Customers
Israel is Not Committing Genocide in Gaza, Despite Hamas Terrorists’ Claims
Rising Anti-Semitism: A Real Crisis Affecting Real People
Tipsheet

Supreme Court to Hear 'Remain in Mexico' Case

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court announced it was taking up the "Remain in Mexico" case, after the Biden administration has appealed. The policy from the Trump administration requires those seeking asylum who come to the United States via the southern border to wait in Mexico for a hearing in the U.S. immigration court.

Advertisement

Upon taking office in January 2021, President Joe Biden quickly got to work getting rid of the policy, but a ruling last August from U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk in Texas upheld the policy. 

The Biden administration's version of the policy was implemented last December, as Julio highlighted from on the ground in Yuma, Arizona. 

The U.S. Supreme Court had also previously upheld "Remain in Mexico," last August after Judge Kacsmaryk's decision, but such an emergency docket decision was unsigned. This use of the shadow docket tactic has been particularly reviled by liberals. 

While SCOTUSblog and liberal news outlets such as CNN bemoan the policy as "controversial," Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, both Republicans, were quick to celebrate. 

Advertisement

The Court will hear the case in April. Curt Levey, a constitutional law attorney and the president of the Committee for Justice took particular notice of the timing. "The Court clearly thought an expedited decision was warranted here because they squeezed a hearing into this term. The other way to expedite it would have been skipping oral argument and deciding the case on the shadow docket. Many on the left are disturbed by the Court's recent use of the shadow docket, but in most cases, it doesn't affect the substance of the ultimate outcome," Levey said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement