Sorry, Dems, Swing Voters Are Not Happy With You Over Schumer Shutdown, But...
So, What Do You Think About the FBI's Update on the Investigation Into...
Why Dems Had to Delete This Tweet About Trump and Jeffrey Epstein
This Hunter Biden Interview Was Totally Out of Control
Top Republican Went Scorched Earth on Dems Over Failed Schumer Shutdown Circus
Hemp Industry Gearing Up for Battle After Spending Bill Ban
The Press Abandons Basic Journalism With the Released Jeffrey Epstein Emails
Democrats Are Why Our Healthcare Costs Keep Rising
Here's What the Creators of Satirical 'Anne Frank' Musical Don't Want You to...
Federal Appeals Court Halts DOT Rules Limiting Immigrant Commerical License Access
COP-30 insanity vs Global Tide of Climate and Energy Reality
Fed Official Backs VP Vance: Illegal Immigration Drove Soaring Housing Prices
Former Fleet Manager of Boston Public School Bus System Charged With Bribery
FBI Arrests Man Accused of Attacking Federal Attorney's Office
Recidivist Fraudster Arrested For Defrauding Owner of Gustave Courbet Painting
Tipsheet

Grand Jury Indicts Dem Attorney in Durham Investigation

AP Photo/Bob Child, File

On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that a federal grand jury indicted attorney Michael Sussmann in a charge that he had lied to the FBI about a client. The indictment was expected, after a report from The New York Times revealed it was coming as part of the Durham investigation. 

Advertisement

The New York Times reported about the announcement on Thursday, in a piece from Charlie Savage. 

Catherine Herridge of CBS News shared details as well and provided a link to the 27 page indictment which was signed by Durham. 

Wednesday's report noted that the statute of limitations means Durham had until this weekend to bring charges. However, there is still much that is unclear.

As Savage reported:

It remains unclear whether Mr. Durham is drafting some kind of lengthy report intended for public consumption, akin to the one Mr. Mueller produced. Out of office, Mr. Trump has repeatedly issued statements fuming, “Where’s Durham?”

The current attorney general, Merrick B. Garland, said at his confirmation hearing in February that he would let Mr. Durham continue to work, but was noncommittal about the details, including how he would handle any final report if Mr. Durham submitted one.

Funding for most Justice Department operations, like much of the federal government, is controlled by an annual budget that covers a fiscal year that begins on Oct. 1 and ends on Sept. 30.

Spokesmen for Mr. Garland and Mr. Durham have declined to comment in response to questions about whether Mr. Durham’s office has funding approval to continue operating after Sept. 30.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos