Why Thom Tillis Should Withdraw This Bill
WaPo's Editorial Board Took a Most Laughable Take Follwing the Israeli Embassy Staffer...
NBC News Peddles Total Fake News About Starving Babies in Gaza
Sorry, Dems, Wisconsin Swing Voters Are Sticking With Trump
Buffalo School System's Failings Worse Than Originally Thought
New England State Becomes First in the Area to Ban Sanctuary City Policies
Beyond Appeasement: Why the Abraham Accords Must Expand Now
WaPo Columnist Accuses Jill Biden of 'Elder Abuse' Over Biden's 2024 Campaign Push
Colorado’s Trans Revolution is Worse Than You Think, As Governor Signs New Law
Don’t Rush the Future at the Expense of the Present
Congress’ Farm Bill Is the Opportunity We’re Looking for to Make America Healthy...
Wyoming Lawsuit Proves Democrats Want Illegal Aliens Voting, Not Deported
Now is the Time to Champion the Child Tax Credit
In Defunding Harvard, Trump Is Defending Free Thought
America’s Higher Education System Is Broken—and It's Costing Americans Everything
Tipsheet

Grand Jury Indicts Dem Attorney in Durham Investigation

AP Photo/Bob Child, File

On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that a federal grand jury indicted attorney Michael Sussmann in a charge that he had lied to the FBI about a client. The indictment was expected, after a report from The New York Times revealed it was coming as part of the Durham investigation. 

Advertisement

The New York Times reported about the announcement on Thursday, in a piece from Charlie Savage. 

Catherine Herridge of CBS News shared details as well and provided a link to the 27 page indictment which was signed by Durham. 

Wednesday's report noted that the statute of limitations means Durham had until this weekend to bring charges. However, there is still much that is unclear.

As Savage reported:

It remains unclear whether Mr. Durham is drafting some kind of lengthy report intended for public consumption, akin to the one Mr. Mueller produced. Out of office, Mr. Trump has repeatedly issued statements fuming, “Where’s Durham?”

The current attorney general, Merrick B. Garland, said at his confirmation hearing in February that he would let Mr. Durham continue to work, but was noncommittal about the details, including how he would handle any final report if Mr. Durham submitted one.

Funding for most Justice Department operations, like much of the federal government, is controlled by an annual budget that covers a fiscal year that begins on Oct. 1 and ends on Sept. 30.

Spokesmen for Mr. Garland and Mr. Durham have declined to comment in response to questions about whether Mr. Durham’s office has funding approval to continue operating after Sept. 30.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement