John Cornyn Will Be a Texas Thom Tillis and That’s Awful
California Is Doing What Now for Homeless Illegal Aliens?!
UK Residents Just Got a Punch to the Gut Regarding This Economic Survey
'I Dig It': Maine's Dem Senate Hopeful Apparently Likes Watching Jewish People Die
It Seems Ro Khanna Might Be the Next Dem Rep to Get Torched...the...
We Know Who Donated to Eric Swalwell
Scott Jennings Shredded This Former Dem Rep's Iran Cheerleading on CNN Last Night
Here Are the Two People DNI Gabbard Issued Criminal Referrals for Concerning...
Ohio Police Did a Welfare Check on a 91-Year-Old Woman, and It Did...
Pocahontas Wants to Spend Jeff Bezos’s Money
The Pope, Three Cardinals, and the Iran War
In Israel, Garbage Trucks Bring the Garbage
Debunking Five Tax Day Myths
Immigration in America: Legal Pathways, Border Reality, and the Fight Over Who Belongs
Trump’s Hormuz Masterstroke: How American Energy Dominance Is Exposing China’s Fatal Weakn...
Tipsheet

Grand Jury Indicts Dem Attorney in Durham Investigation

Grand Jury Indicts Dem Attorney in Durham Investigation
AP Photo/Bob Child, File

On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that a federal grand jury indicted attorney Michael Sussmann in a charge that he had lied to the FBI about a client. The indictment was expected, after a report from The New York Times revealed it was coming as part of the Durham investigation. 

Advertisement

The New York Times reported about the announcement on Thursday, in a piece from Charlie Savage. 

Catherine Herridge of CBS News shared details as well and provided a link to the 27 page indictment which was signed by Durham. 

Wednesday's report noted that the statute of limitations means Durham had until this weekend to bring charges. However, there is still much that is unclear.

As Savage reported:

It remains unclear whether Mr. Durham is drafting some kind of lengthy report intended for public consumption, akin to the one Mr. Mueller produced. Out of office, Mr. Trump has repeatedly issued statements fuming, “Where’s Durham?”

The current attorney general, Merrick B. Garland, said at his confirmation hearing in February that he would let Mr. Durham continue to work, but was noncommittal about the details, including how he would handle any final report if Mr. Durham submitted one.

Funding for most Justice Department operations, like much of the federal government, is controlled by an annual budget that covers a fiscal year that begins on Oct. 1 and ends on Sept. 30.

Spokesmen for Mr. Garland and Mr. Durham have declined to comment in response to questions about whether Mr. Durham’s office has funding approval to continue operating after Sept. 30.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos