Is There Anything More Annoying Than Europeans Complaining About America?
Of Course, We Should've Expected the GOP to Muck This Up
Trump Reveals Hilarious Reason for Why Marjorie Taylor Greene Turned on Him
Why This CNN Contributor's Take on Trump's Oil Tanker Seizure Was a Little...
Clown Nose Comes Off As Jon Stewart Wins a Journalism Prize, and The...
Tokyo Tucker
Newsom’s Memoir: Another Step in His 2028 Self-Promotion Tour
Trump Can't Insult Reporters When They Go After Him?
GAO Provides Yet More Evidence for Why Enhanced Obamacare Subsidies Must Expire
Student Loan Forgiveness: A Band-Aid on a Trillion-Dollar Wound
The Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Organization
Congress Should End Brazen Disregard for Student Privacy, Parental Rights
College Football Leadership: A Study in Narcissism
Treasury Sanctions Evaders in Venezuela’s Oil Sector
Georgia Men Filed Over 2,500 Unemployment Claims in $17M Unemployment Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Grand Jury Indicts Dem Attorney in Durham Investigation

AP Photo/Bob Child, File

On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that a federal grand jury indicted attorney Michael Sussmann in a charge that he had lied to the FBI about a client. The indictment was expected, after a report from The New York Times revealed it was coming as part of the Durham investigation. 

Advertisement

The New York Times reported about the announcement on Thursday, in a piece from Charlie Savage. 

Catherine Herridge of CBS News shared details as well and provided a link to the 27 page indictment which was signed by Durham. 

Wednesday's report noted that the statute of limitations means Durham had until this weekend to bring charges. However, there is still much that is unclear.

As Savage reported:

It remains unclear whether Mr. Durham is drafting some kind of lengthy report intended for public consumption, akin to the one Mr. Mueller produced. Out of office, Mr. Trump has repeatedly issued statements fuming, “Where’s Durham?”

The current attorney general, Merrick B. Garland, said at his confirmation hearing in February that he would let Mr. Durham continue to work, but was noncommittal about the details, including how he would handle any final report if Mr. Durham submitted one.

Funding for most Justice Department operations, like much of the federal government, is controlled by an annual budget that covers a fiscal year that begins on Oct. 1 and ends on Sept. 30.

Spokesmen for Mr. Garland and Mr. Durham have declined to comment in response to questions about whether Mr. Durham’s office has funding approval to continue operating after Sept. 30.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement