Jim Acosta Had a Sad Gathering of Resistance Losers in DC
We Are in a Political Game
Democrats Have Suddenly Become Interested in the Epstein Files – I Wonder Why?
Top Lawyer Shuts Down Elon Musk’s Explosive Claim About Trump and Epstein
'Corrupt As Hell': Trump Goes Off on The New York Times and Washington...
The Spat vs. the Scandal
Tehran’s Nuclear Lies Unraveled by Iran’s Democratic Resistance
Trump Administration Blasts Boston Mayor's 'Sickening' Comments About ICE Agents
The Latest Jobs Report Is Here
Musk Changed His Tune on Decommissioning Dragon Amid Trump Feud. Here's Why.
There's Been an Update About That Reported Phone Call Between Trump, Musk Following...
Here's What Jasmine Crockett Thinks Is Going to Help Her Party for 'This...
Disgusting: Major Event in Texas Canceled Over Jihadist Threats
Four Democrat-Led States Urge the FDA to Lift Abortion Pill Restrictions
Scott Jennings Certainly Has Thoughts on KJP’s New Book
Tipsheet

Critics Deceptively Claim Laura Ingraham Wants People to Starve

Critics have claimed that Fox News host Laura Ingraham wants people to starve, based on a clip of her and and Jon Taffer of "Bar Rescue" talking about unemployment benefits.

Advertisement

The tweet in question comes from Andrew Lawrence, the Deputy Director of Rapid Response for Media Matters for America. 

Lawrence's clip does not include Ingraham's comments clarifying that she actually supports benefits for people who need it.

Lawrence is referring to comments from Taffer who said that "I have friends in the military who train military dogs, and they only feed a military dog at night, because a hungry dog is an obedient dog. If we're  not causing people to be hungry to work, then we are providing them with all the meals they need sitting at home." 

Taffer has since apologized. 

The segment is also getting attention due to a tweet from Justin Baragona of The Daily Beast. 

Advertisement

Others are also pointing out that Baragona's tweet does not include Ingraham's clarification in his text.

"Well, what if we just cut off the unemployment, hunger is a pretty powerful thing. I don't mean physical hunger, because people who truly are in need need help, I'm talking about people who can work but refuse to work, but the government is literally putting anvils in many ways on people's shoulders through the mandate, regulations, and now through free money which obviously -- the piper eventually has to be paid," Ingraham had said.

The segment also discussed how, as Taffer put it, "opportunity is enormous today, but nobody is seizing it." Ingraham and Taffer were discussing federal unemployment benefits as a disincentive for people to return to work, which has also been the subject of columns for Townhall, including from Scott Morefield and Laura Hollis.

Taffer shared examples of businesses having to change, with his dog's veterinarian having to push back his appointment, to truck drivers, to a need for more self-check outs. "This isn't specific to any industry, Laura, it is across all industries. It's across different income levels as well," he said.

Advertisement

As Spencer reported last month, Democratic states with higher unemployment benefits have had higher unemployment.

The transcript of the relevant portion of the segment read:

TAFFER: If you get $800 a week of unemployment benefits and you live with a partner getting $800 a week unemployment, $1600 a week, $83,000 a year for that household in unemployment benefits. The median income in America is only 63,000. We are incentivizing people to stay home.  What if we gave that additional unemployment benefits to employers to incentivize people to go to work? 

INGRAHAM: Well, what if we just cut off the unemployment, hunger is a pretty powerful thing. I don't mean physical hunger, because people who truly are in need need help, I'm talking about people who can work but refuse to work, but the government is literally putting anvils in many ways on people's shoulders through the mandate, regulations, and now through free money which obviously -- the piper eventually has to be paid. John, I want to ask you though about this idea of work-life balance. Because nobody wants to miss their kids growing up, and you stay in the office your whole life and you never see your family. So that's really important. However, have we taken that a step too far when you think of, well, a lot of the millennials talking about I need time for "self-care," I don't know why I'm harping on that tonight, but the whole self-care movement is a little -- my mother is not with us, but she worked from the time she was 12 during the Depression and if she heard the self-care thing, I think her head would explode.   

TAFFER: You know, I think that's right. I have friends in the military who train military dogs, and they only feed a military dog at night, because a hungry dog is an obedient dog. If we're  not causing people to be hungry to work, then we are providing them with all the meals they need sitting at home. I'm completely with you, Laura, these benefits make no sense to us. And on top of the impact of not getting employees and not being able to run our businesses, in my industry we have meat prices up 10 percent, chicken prices are up, 15 percent.  

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement