Yes, Georgia Is Having a Special Session to Redraw Its Maps, but You...
Finally, We Can Turn the Page on Too Late Powell
Let's Not Forget About Left-Wing Violence
Press Is Attacking Pratt, Ignoring the Dems Attacking Courts, and Overlooking the IdiAOC...
Here's Another Woke Judge Putting Criminals Ahead of Public Safety
Here's More From Xavier Becerra's Embarrassing Interview With KTLA
JD Vance Announces the White House Fraud Task Force's Latest Move to Stop...
LOL: Former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas Now Claims He Wanted Biden to Close...
China: Our Enemy, Not Our Rival
Six-Month Freeze: CMS Blocks New Medicare Enrollments for Hospice and Home Health Agencies...
DOJ Announces $30M Settlement to End PayPal’s 'Illegal DEI Lending Program'
New Poll Shows Abdul El-Sayed Leading Michigan Democrat U.S. Senate Primary
Leader of 'Maniac Murder Cult' Gets 15 Years for Plotting Poison Candy Attack...
Nearly 700 Fake Claims, $11 Million Stolen: Illinois Woman Found Guilty of COVID-19...
SNAP Crackdown: Mississippi Man Latest in Family Fraud Spree to Plead Guilty
Tipsheet

Wisconsin Supreme Court Delivers a Blow to Gov. Tony Evers' Pandemic Mandate

Wisconsin Supreme Court Delivers a Blow to Gov. Tony Evers' Pandemic Mandate
AP Photo/Scott Bauer

The Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered a blow to Democrat Governor Tony Evers (D-WI) by striking down his statewide mask mandate; the court concluded that Evers overstepped his executive authority by authorizing a renewal of the mandate unilaterally. 

Advertisement

Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote that the court believes that Evers did not act in compliance of the law by issuing mandates that exceed his authority as governor.

"The question in this case is not whether the Governor acted wisely; it is whether he acted lawfully. We conclude he did not."

Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, one of three justices in the minority on the court, argued that wide-reaching mandates fall within the governor's power to protect citizens.

“We are in the midst of a worldwide pandemic that so far has claimed the lives of over a half million people in this country. And with the stakes so high, the majority not only arrives at erroneous conclusions, but it also obscures the consequence of its decision. Unfortunately, the ultimate consequence of the majority’s decision is that it places yet another roadblock to an effective governmental response to COVID-19," she wrote in a dissenting opinion to Wednesday's ruling.

Advertisement

Wednesday’s ruling is not the first setback for Evers regarding COVID restrictions. In May, the court struck down the governor’s “safer at home” edict, ruling that he did not have the power to issue such an executive order.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement