Another University Gets Nailed for Civil Rights Violations
The Numbers on New ICE Applications Are In
Texas Dems Throw in the Towel on Congressional Map Fight
Texas Senate Passes New Congressional Map That Caused Dems to Melt Down
Beto O'Rourke Might Be Facing Jail Time for This Political Stunt
Dana Bash Opens the Bernie Sanders Election Office
Vance Appears to Be the Clear Frontrunner In 2028 GOP Primary
Russia Launches Surprise Offensive Days Before Putin To Meet With Trump
'Big Balls’ Bravery Could Earn Him the Medal of Freedom
MSNBC Contributor’s Out-of-Touch Take on D.C. Crime Sparks Backlash
DOJ Settles Lawsuits Challenging Race-Based Admissions at West Point and Air Force Academy
D.C. Police Chief Stumped by Basic Question on Chain of Command
Democrats Hit Rock Bottom: New Poll Shows Party Favorability at All-Time Low
Paxton Targets Beto for Defying Court Order, Calls Fundraising ‘Beto Bribes'
Assistant AG Dhillon: Tackling D.C. Crime ‘Overdue’
Tipsheet

Wisconsin Supreme Court Delivers a Blow to Gov. Tony Evers' Pandemic Mandate

AP Photo/Scott Bauer

The Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered a blow to Democrat Governor Tony Evers (D-WI) by striking down his statewide mask mandate; the court concluded that Evers overstepped his executive authority by authorizing a renewal of the mandate unilaterally. 

Advertisement

Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote that the court believes that Evers did not act in compliance of the law by issuing mandates that exceed his authority as governor.

"The question in this case is not whether the Governor acted wisely; it is whether he acted lawfully. We conclude he did not."

Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, one of three justices in the minority on the court, argued that wide-reaching mandates fall within the governor's power to protect citizens.

“We are in the midst of a worldwide pandemic that so far has claimed the lives of over a half million people in this country. And with the stakes so high, the majority not only arrives at erroneous conclusions, but it also obscures the consequence of its decision. Unfortunately, the ultimate consequence of the majority’s decision is that it places yet another roadblock to an effective governmental response to COVID-19," she wrote in a dissenting opinion to Wednesday's ruling.

Advertisement

Wednesday’s ruling is not the first setback for Evers regarding COVID restrictions. In May, the court struck down the governor’s “safer at home” edict, ruling that he did not have the power to issue such an executive order.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement