Here's What Trump Did After That Pharma Executive Collapsed in the Oval Office
Let's Make Mamdani the Face of the Democratic Party
'I Lived Behind the Iron Curtain:' Man Who Fled Communism Warns New Yorkers...
Supreme Court Issues Emergency Order Temporarily Blocking Full SNAP Payments
A Century Later, Some Haven't Learned History's Lessons on Communism
Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh Reflect on Courage, Forgiveness, and Faith at Scalia Memori...
100-Year-Old WWII Veteran Says the Sacrifices of His Generation Were Not Worth It
The Evil Unleashed in 2008: From Obama, to Biden, to Harris, to Mamdani
Surrender, But Don't Give Yourself Away
A Veterans Day Call to Restore the Warrior Corps
Bringing Back Hemp Prohibition Would Be a Massive Mistake
Congress Shouldn’t Bury a Hemp Ban in a Bill to Feed Families and...
Federal Judge Blocks Trump From Sending Troops to Portland
Trump Orders DOJ to Investigate Foreign Meat-Packing Companies Over Price-Fixing
US Strikes Deal to Restore Funding to Cornell University
Tipsheet

Wisconsin Supreme Court Delivers a Blow to Gov. Tony Evers' Pandemic Mandate

AP Photo/Scott Bauer

The Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered a blow to Democrat Governor Tony Evers (D-WI) by striking down his statewide mask mandate; the court concluded that Evers overstepped his executive authority by authorizing a renewal of the mandate unilaterally. 

Advertisement

Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote that the court believes that Evers did not act in compliance of the law by issuing mandates that exceed his authority as governor.

"The question in this case is not whether the Governor acted wisely; it is whether he acted lawfully. We conclude he did not."

Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, one of three justices in the minority on the court, argued that wide-reaching mandates fall within the governor's power to protect citizens.

“We are in the midst of a worldwide pandemic that so far has claimed the lives of over a half million people in this country. And with the stakes so high, the majority not only arrives at erroneous conclusions, but it also obscures the consequence of its decision. Unfortunately, the ultimate consequence of the majority’s decision is that it places yet another roadblock to an effective governmental response to COVID-19," she wrote in a dissenting opinion to Wednesday's ruling.

Advertisement

Wednesday’s ruling is not the first setback for Evers regarding COVID restrictions. In May, the court struck down the governor’s “safer at home” edict, ruling that he did not have the power to issue such an executive order.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement