Senate Passed Its Reconciliation Package, but Failed to Add Save America Act Provisions....
We Have Another Dem Scandal
The Real Story Behind Ruben Gallego's Trip to Colombia
Consultant Sentenced After Convicted of Bribery Scheme
Florida’s DCF Took Their Children—and the Supreme Court Just Turned Its Back on...
While the VA Redistricting Referendum Goes to Court, There's Another Option to Counter...
Wisconsin's Lt. Governor Vows to Craft State Budgets in Secret If She Succeeds...
Audit Shows Seattle Followed the California Model of Dealing With Homelessness
Detroit Is So Far Gone, Officials Are Begging Criminals Not to Steal These
SPLC, Swalwell, and the War for America's Minds
The SPLC's Indictment Raises a Larger Question: Could the Left be Funding Right-Wing...
Watch Tim Walz Brush Off the Massive Fraud Scandal Uncovered in Minnesota With...
See the Grades CA Gubernatorial Candidates Gave Newsom on His Handling of the...
Trump Announces Three-Week Extension of Israel-Lebanon Ceasefire After White House Meeting
The SPLC Owed Us an Apology -- A Federal Grand Jury Just Handed...
Tipsheet

Wisconsin Supreme Court Delivers a Blow to Gov. Tony Evers' Pandemic Mandate

Wisconsin Supreme Court Delivers a Blow to Gov. Tony Evers' Pandemic Mandate
AP Photo/Scott Bauer

The Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered a blow to Democrat Governor Tony Evers (D-WI) by striking down his statewide mask mandate; the court concluded that Evers overstepped his executive authority by authorizing a renewal of the mandate unilaterally. 

Advertisement

Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote that the court believes that Evers did not act in compliance of the law by issuing mandates that exceed his authority as governor.

"The question in this case is not whether the Governor acted wisely; it is whether he acted lawfully. We conclude he did not."

Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, one of three justices in the minority on the court, argued that wide-reaching mandates fall within the governor's power to protect citizens.

“We are in the midst of a worldwide pandemic that so far has claimed the lives of over a half million people in this country. And with the stakes so high, the majority not only arrives at erroneous conclusions, but it also obscures the consequence of its decision. Unfortunately, the ultimate consequence of the majority’s decision is that it places yet another roadblock to an effective governmental response to COVID-19," she wrote in a dissenting opinion to Wednesday's ruling.

Advertisement

Wednesday’s ruling is not the first setback for Evers regarding COVID restrictions. In May, the court struck down the governor’s “safer at home” edict, ruling that he did not have the power to issue such an executive order.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement