Oh, God, This Woman Again? CNN Guest Made Some Mind-Blowing Remarks About Red...
How Karoline Leavitt Responded to This HuffPo Reporter Was Total Perfection
Trump Commutes George Santos’ Prison Sentence, Citing 'Mistreatment' and Political Double...
CNN Says Hegseth Will Force Them to Attack Him Like They Have Been,...
Forget 'No Kings' and Observe 'No MSNBC' Instead
Bondi’s Senate Performance Should Be Required Study for GOP Members of Congress
Donald Trump and the 2026 and 2028 Elections
The Direct Path to Affordable Medicines
Why Has the World Not Woken Up to Iran's Execution Spree?
Nutrition Education Is the First Bite to a Healthier America
The Middle East: Juxtaposing Israel's Just Military Victories and the Moral Defeat of...
Trump Set the Stage for Strategic Engagement With the Caucasus – Now Congress...
Bipartisan Bill Aims to Combat Organized Retail Theft
Don't Be Fooled by Chicken Little Predictions About Air Travel
Founder and CFO of Investment Firm 777 Partners Charged With $500 Million Fraud...
Tipsheet

Wisconsin Supreme Court Delivers a Blow to Gov. Tony Evers' Pandemic Mandate

AP Photo/Scott Bauer

The Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered a blow to Democrat Governor Tony Evers (D-WI) by striking down his statewide mask mandate; the court concluded that Evers overstepped his executive authority by authorizing a renewal of the mandate unilaterally. 

Advertisement

Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote that the court believes that Evers did not act in compliance of the law by issuing mandates that exceed his authority as governor.

"The question in this case is not whether the Governor acted wisely; it is whether he acted lawfully. We conclude he did not."

Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, one of three justices in the minority on the court, argued that wide-reaching mandates fall within the governor's power to protect citizens.

“We are in the midst of a worldwide pandemic that so far has claimed the lives of over a half million people in this country. And with the stakes so high, the majority not only arrives at erroneous conclusions, but it also obscures the consequence of its decision. Unfortunately, the ultimate consequence of the majority’s decision is that it places yet another roadblock to an effective governmental response to COVID-19," she wrote in a dissenting opinion to Wednesday's ruling.

Advertisement

Wednesday’s ruling is not the first setback for Evers regarding COVID restrictions. In May, the court struck down the governor’s “safer at home” edict, ruling that he did not have the power to issue such an executive order.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos