Woke Karen Issues Apology After Berating Target Employee
'God Answered Us.' Listen to Israeli Hostage Omer Shem Tov's Incredible AmFest Speech
Rep. Laurel Libby: Maine Dems ‘Abdicated Responsibility’ as State Sues Schools Over Transg...
The UK Is a Police State
Teach Your Children Well
The Epstein Files Are Here
Stop Calling Cardinal Dolan a Conservative
Fraudster Sentenced to 71 Months for Crypto Ponzi Scheme and Illegal Reentry
Trump Announces 'Very Serious Retaliation' Against ISIS After Syria Attack
Tungsten Carbide Importer to Pay $54M in Customs Duty Evasion Case
'To My Haters: F You' DC Police Chief Cries in Fiery Resignation
FBI Says $70M in Illicit Funds Flowed Through E-Note Crypto Service
Criminals Likely Stole $9 Billion From Minnesota Taxpayers
'Biggest Thing to Ever Happen on Healthcare' Trump Touts After Slashing Drug Prices
This Lawmaker Won't Seek Reelection to Congress
Tipsheet

Wisconsin Supreme Court Delivers a Blow to Gov. Tony Evers' Pandemic Mandate

AP Photo/Scott Bauer

The Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered a blow to Democrat Governor Tony Evers (D-WI) by striking down his statewide mask mandate; the court concluded that Evers overstepped his executive authority by authorizing a renewal of the mandate unilaterally. 

Advertisement

Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote that the court believes that Evers did not act in compliance of the law by issuing mandates that exceed his authority as governor.

"The question in this case is not whether the Governor acted wisely; it is whether he acted lawfully. We conclude he did not."

Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, one of three justices in the minority on the court, argued that wide-reaching mandates fall within the governor's power to protect citizens.

“We are in the midst of a worldwide pandemic that so far has claimed the lives of over a half million people in this country. And with the stakes so high, the majority not only arrives at erroneous conclusions, but it also obscures the consequence of its decision. Unfortunately, the ultimate consequence of the majority’s decision is that it places yet another roadblock to an effective governmental response to COVID-19," she wrote in a dissenting opinion to Wednesday's ruling.

Advertisement

Wednesday’s ruling is not the first setback for Evers regarding COVID restrictions. In May, the court struck down the governor’s “safer at home” edict, ruling that he did not have the power to issue such an executive order.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement