How Bad Is D.C. Crime? Here Are the Stats.
D.C. Police Commander Was Cooking the Books on Crime
Cornerstone University Appoints Salem Media's Eric Metaxas As Distinguished Fellow
D.C. Police Are Now Under Federal Control
Illegal Immigrant Who Raped, Murdered Rachel Morin Has Been Sentenced
‘We See You, We’re Watching You’: Pirro Issues Blistering Warning to DC Criminals
Media Claims Israel Assassinated a Journalist – but There Is More to the...
Federal Judge Shoots Down DOJ Push to Unseal Ghislaine Maxwell's Grand Jury Records
The Socialist Surge: DSA’s Bold Plan to Take Over the Democratic Party
Zelenskyy Not Getting a Seat at Trump-Putin Summit
Israel Broadens the Scope of Takeover Operation for Gaza
Is Mamdani a Good Choice for NYC Mayor? Hochul Responds.
Abbott Issues a Warning Over Redistricting Fight With Dems
Enough Is Enough: Pirro Blasts D.C. Leaders for Protecting Criminals
Trump Wants to Privatize Freddie and Fannie - Key Components in the 2008...
Tipsheet

Elise Stefanik Responds to 'Sexist' Blog Post Mocking Her as 'Childless'

Greg Nash/Pool via AP

Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) responded to a now-deleted blog post in a local New York newspaper that ridiculed her as “childless.” Two writers for the Albany Times Union, Peter Marino and Lale Davidson, took aim at Stefanik as a “rising star” in the Republican Party in an attempted satirical account of Stefanik interacting with children. 

Advertisement

"I myself am childless because I am a rising star in the Republican Party, and family planning is possible by way of the contraception paid for by my excellent taxpayer-provided healthcare plan," the pair wrote in the fictional account of Stefanik speaking to children.

In a joint statement with her husband, Stefanik is demanding a retraction of the sexist publication.

"As a young couple, we have developed a thick skin over many years as we have become accustomed to repeated sexist smears in media coverage. However, the Times Union’s decision to publish an article that mocked us as ‘childless’ is a new low and is truly heinous and wildly inappropriate is truly heinous and wildly inappropriate. The shameful statement is not only inherently sexist, but also hateful, abusive, and heartless,” the couple wrote in a statement. “The Times Union publisher, editors, and staff have clearly let the paper’s standards sink so low that they have chosen to embrace sexist scum and content under the masthead. They should be ashamed. We not only require a complete retraction, but we also demand an immediate public apology and explanation as to how this was allowed to be published in the Times Union and who will be held responsible and accountable.”

Advertisement

The paper has yet to issue an apology to Stefanik.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement