What Do the Dems Do After They’ve Done Their Worst and It Flops?
Stephen Colbert Hates Black Women and Other Universal Truths
Politico Struggles With Illegal Voters and Censorship Lies
The Church of Talarico
Remembering Rev. Jesse Jackson
AI – AI – O
NBC Poll Finds Declining Support for Trump's Immigration Agenda — Blame NBC
Western Civilization Will Disintegrate Without Truth
Too Big to Fail, Too Big to Care
What Should President Trump Say at His State of the Union on Tuesday?
Why Repealing the Endangerment Finding Is a Triumph for Science, Jobs, and American...
Why Is the Federal Government Fundraising for Political Orgs – and Mostly Benefiting...
DC Mayor Bowser Asks Trump Administration: Help Clean Waste from Potomac River
Former NY Sales Director Sentenced to Prison in $70M Medicare Brain Scan Scheme
Florida, Texas Executives Get 20 Years for $233M Affordable Care Act Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Elise Stefanik Responds to 'Sexist' Blog Post Mocking Her as 'Childless'

Elise Stefanik Responds to 'Sexist' Blog Post Mocking Her as 'Childless'
Greg Nash/Pool via AP

Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) responded to a now-deleted blog post in a local New York newspaper that ridiculed her as “childless.” Two writers for the Albany Times Union, Peter Marino and Lale Davidson, took aim at Stefanik as a “rising star” in the Republican Party in an attempted satirical account of Stefanik interacting with children. 

Advertisement

"I myself am childless because I am a rising star in the Republican Party, and family planning is possible by way of the contraception paid for by my excellent taxpayer-provided healthcare plan," the pair wrote in the fictional account of Stefanik speaking to children.

In a joint statement with her husband, Stefanik is demanding a retraction of the sexist publication.

"As a young couple, we have developed a thick skin over many years as we have become accustomed to repeated sexist smears in media coverage. However, the Times Union’s decision to publish an article that mocked us as ‘childless’ is a new low and is truly heinous and wildly inappropriate is truly heinous and wildly inappropriate. The shameful statement is not only inherently sexist, but also hateful, abusive, and heartless,” the couple wrote in a statement. “The Times Union publisher, editors, and staff have clearly let the paper’s standards sink so low that they have chosen to embrace sexist scum and content under the masthead. They should be ashamed. We not only require a complete retraction, but we also demand an immediate public apology and explanation as to how this was allowed to be published in the Times Union and who will be held responsible and accountable.”

Advertisement

The paper has yet to issue an apology to Stefanik.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement