Lindsey Graham Taking a Sledgehammer to Dems During the Kavanaugh Hearings Was an...
Did NBC News Reveal the Cause of Death for Sen. Lindsey Graham?
Dem Maine Women Are in 'Mourning' Over the Implosion of Graham Platner's Campaign
Wait, Is This Why Ro Khanna Was Hoping to Be Detained by Israeli...
With Lindsey Graham's Passing, What’s Next for the SC Senate Race?
Leftists Should Want America to Be a Christian Nation
The Consensus Senator
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 328: Biblical Principles in Lincoln’s Second Inaugural
It Is So Plain What Is Wrong With America Today
Choose Life
Time to Hold 'Nonprofit' Hospitals Accountable to the Taxpayers Who Fund Them
These Ghouls Couldn't Help But Gloat Over Lindsey Graham's Death
Trump, World Leaders Respond to Lindsey Graham's Death
Sen. Lindsey Graham Dead After 'Sudden Illness'
Is There a 'Spectre' Haunting America?
Tipsheet

Elise Stefanik Responds to 'Sexist' Blog Post Mocking Her as 'Childless'

Elise Stefanik Responds to 'Sexist' Blog Post Mocking Her as 'Childless'
Greg Nash/Pool via AP

Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) responded to a now-deleted blog post in a local New York newspaper that ridiculed her as “childless.” Two writers for the Albany Times Union, Peter Marino and Lale Davidson, took aim at Stefanik as a “rising star” in the Republican Party in an attempted satirical account of Stefanik interacting with children. 

Advertisement

"I myself am childless because I am a rising star in the Republican Party, and family planning is possible by way of the contraception paid for by my excellent taxpayer-provided healthcare plan," the pair wrote in the fictional account of Stefanik speaking to children.

In a joint statement with her husband, Stefanik is demanding a retraction of the sexist publication.

"As a young couple, we have developed a thick skin over many years as we have become accustomed to repeated sexist smears in media coverage. However, the Times Union’s decision to publish an article that mocked us as ‘childless’ is a new low and is truly heinous and wildly inappropriate is truly heinous and wildly inappropriate. The shameful statement is not only inherently sexist, but also hateful, abusive, and heartless,” the couple wrote in a statement. “The Times Union publisher, editors, and staff have clearly let the paper’s standards sink so low that they have chosen to embrace sexist scum and content under the masthead. They should be ashamed. We not only require a complete retraction, but we also demand an immediate public apology and explanation as to how this was allowed to be published in the Times Union and who will be held responsible and accountable.”

Advertisement

The paper has yet to issue an apology to Stefanik.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement