Trump’s Triumph, the Establishment’s Shame
Trump Roasts View Co-Host for Refusing to Honor Bet on Israeli Hostages
Shut Down! Do You Care?
The Schumer Shutdown Continues: Senate Dems Once Again Refuse to Open the Government
Spanberger Lashes Herself to the Democratic Anchor, Jay Jones
And the Winner Is...Israel
Bolivian 'Right-Wing' Candidate Mocks Trump, Considers Amnesty for Socialist Criminal
Charlie Kirk Posthumously Awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom
President Trump Declines to Commit to Two-State Solution, Says His Focus Is on...
Naked and Afraid: Portland Protesters Strip Down to Oppose President Trump
Will the Palestinians Pass the Israel Test?
Hegseth Is Saving Our Military. Our Police and Fire Departments Should Be...
The NRA Supports SCOTUS Petitioners Who Lost Their Gun Rights Because of Nonviolent...
It Took Oklahoma Three Days to Prove Just How Dangerous CDLs for Illegal...
Portland Protesters Deserve the National Guard
Tipsheet

Elise Stefanik Responds to 'Sexist' Blog Post Mocking Her as 'Childless'

Greg Nash/Pool via AP

Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) responded to a now-deleted blog post in a local New York newspaper that ridiculed her as “childless.” Two writers for the Albany Times Union, Peter Marino and Lale Davidson, took aim at Stefanik as a “rising star” in the Republican Party in an attempted satirical account of Stefanik interacting with children. 

Advertisement

"I myself am childless because I am a rising star in the Republican Party, and family planning is possible by way of the contraception paid for by my excellent taxpayer-provided healthcare plan," the pair wrote in the fictional account of Stefanik speaking to children.

In a joint statement with her husband, Stefanik is demanding a retraction of the sexist publication.

"As a young couple, we have developed a thick skin over many years as we have become accustomed to repeated sexist smears in media coverage. However, the Times Union’s decision to publish an article that mocked us as ‘childless’ is a new low and is truly heinous and wildly inappropriate is truly heinous and wildly inappropriate. The shameful statement is not only inherently sexist, but also hateful, abusive, and heartless,” the couple wrote in a statement. “The Times Union publisher, editors, and staff have clearly let the paper’s standards sink so low that they have chosen to embrace sexist scum and content under the masthead. They should be ashamed. We not only require a complete retraction, but we also demand an immediate public apology and explanation as to how this was allowed to be published in the Times Union and who will be held responsible and accountable.”

Advertisement

The paper has yet to issue an apology to Stefanik.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement