Here's What Shocked a Former MSNBC Analyst About Erika Kirk's Heartbreaking Address
The ‘Progressive’ Left – The ‘Democratic’ Party – Has Shown You Exactly Who...
Spanberger Faces Questions As Chesterfield School Board Member Urged to Resign Over Charli...
Trustee Resigns As Oxford Union Faces Backlash After President-Elect Celebrates Charlie Ki...
South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson Introduces Bill to Re-Impose Jackson-Vanik Sanctions on Rus...
I Am a Yankee Doodle Dandy
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 285: Archaeology Proves King David a Historical Figure...
UN General Assembly Could Mark a Turning Point on Iran
Charlie Kirk’s Assassination and the Rising Tide of Left-Wing Political Violence
The Voice of a Mother
How Trump’s Tariffs Helped Thwart a War in Southeast Asia
Charlie Kirk Killed By Extremist—David Hogg Makes It About Himself
DOJ Declares School Dissent Protected Under First Amendment
'We Are Charlie Kirk!' South Koreans Take to the Streets in Global Show...
Co-CEO of Chinese Technology Company and Financial Advisor Indicted for Over $100M Securit...
Tipsheet

Dems Claim Judiciary Republicans Broke Rules in Holding Vote on Judge Barrett... They Didn't.

Erin Scott/Pool via AP

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee boycotted the committee’s vote to advance Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court nomination early on Thursday morning. Led by Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Republicans on the committee were able to hold the vote without the minority party members present, per committee and Senate rules.

Advertisement

The committee’s rules allowed Sen. Graham to hold a vote on reporting Judge Barrett’s nomination to the full Senate, as he was able to retain quorum even with Democrats’ boycott of committee business. The rules permit the reporting of nominations as long as a majority of the committee, regardless of party, is physically present. All 12 GOP members showed up to advance Judge Barrett’s nomination out of committee. 

The Senate’s rules, which govern the committee voting process, also validate Sen. Graham holding his committee's vote on Judge Barrett. The rules prohibit a point of order from being raised on the Senate floor regarding committee occurrences, as long as a majority of committee members were physically present and a majority voted “yes” on the action at hand, both of which occurred under Sen. Graham’s leadership on Thursday morning.

“The vote of any committee to report a measure or matter shall require the concurrence of a majority of the members of the committee who are present,” Senate Standing Rule XXVI.7(a)(3) reads. “Action by any committee in reporting any measure or matter in accordance with the requirements of this subparagraph shall constitute the ratification by the committee of all action theretofore taken by the committee with respect to that measure or matter, including votes taken upon the measure or matter or any amendment thereto, and no point of order shall lie with respect to that measure or matter on the ground that such previous action with respect thereto by such committee was not taken in compliance with such requirements.”

Advertisement

Senate Democrats held a press conference after they staged a boycott of the committee’s vote. They claimed that Republicans violated rules, procedure, and precedent, calling the markup “illegitimate,” but their claims are not based in fact or validated by Senate rules. 

The committee’s Democratic members’ boycott of the vote to put Judge Barrett on the Senate floor only made advancing her nomination easier. Despite opposition from the Senate’s minority party, Judge Barrett will receive a vote on the Senate floor on Monday afternoon.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos