Tipsheet
Premium

The European Climate Cult Demands Human Sacrifice

As I've pointed out before, Rush Limbaugh warned that communism wasn't dead after the fall of the U.S.S.R. and the Berlin Wall. He said that communism would be repackaged as environmentalism, and the watermelons (green on the outside, red on the inside) have lived up to Limbaugh's prediction.

Every single 'climate change' policy is just repackaged and repurposed communism, meant to impoverish us, limit our freedoms, lower our standard of living, and elevate a privileged class above us who tell us how to run our lives. Much like communism, which killed 100 million people in the 20th century, the climate cult also costs lives.

They see this as a feature, not a bug, of their ideology, by the way. If humans drive climate change, the best way to combat it is by having fewer humans. That's why they discourage people from having children and why Europe — currently facing a summertime heatwave — would rather let people die in droves than use air conditioning.

Of course, we have to also wonder if letting the elderly die reduces the burden on their 'universal' health care systems. After all, Canada has solved some of its backlog and health care expenses by euthanizing tens of thousands of people, many with non-terminal conditions.

Of course, the Left's own arguments belie their true motives here, as CBS News exposed.

The European bureaucrat admits heat is the biggest killer, but that Europe doesn't plan on putting forth common sense measures like air conditioning so they can combat future climate change. In other words, they will sacrifice your grandma, much in the way the Aztecs sacrificed people, believing her death will control the weather down the road.

They're doing this by letting people die today. 

Let's draw this line of reasoning out to its inevitable conclusion: when not enough people drop dead from heat waves, the next step is broader extermination of people. Whether this is more 'assisted suicide' programs, or countries passing laws limiting the number of children we can have (and making forced abortions and sterilizations part of that agenda), or continuing to refuse to use air conditioning to keep people alive in the summer, I don't know. But back in 2023, climate scientists were warning that humans' breathing was bad for the environment, and I can connect the dots.

In the end, this is not about climate change — it is about control and power. The same ideology that once marched under the red flag now wears a green cloak, demanding we sacrifice prosperity, freedom, and even lives on the altar of Gaia. From discouraging childbearing to opposing air conditioning while the elderly die, the pattern is unmistakable: they want fewer humans, and they'll do whatever it takes to get there. We have seen this deadly playbook before. The antidote remains what it has always been: rejecting centralized power, embracing human ingenuity, affordable energy, and the unapologetic pursuit of life, liberty, and abundance. The watermelons must not be allowed to write the final chapter.