Tipsheet

The Reactions to Justice Jackson's Questions During Birthright Citizenship Argument Were Gold

Things don’t look good for the Trump administration on the birthright citizenship case. There seems to be a strong majority skeptical of their challenge to the legal idea, even though one might argue that the Founders never envisioned millions of people crossing our border without wanting to assimilate, breeding like rabbits to claim many benefits paid for by us taxpayers.   

How can someone, for example, meet the domicile benchmark when existing law states that those entering the US illegally can be deported if caught by the police?  

When Justice Gorsuch questioned if the government was citing Roman law, it was not the best start, but at least that wing of the court was going off precedent or inquiring about it through the Constitution. Yet Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s example was, well, incoherent. It did provide some grade-A reactions, though: 

I mean, what is happening, folks? 

No doubt the other eight jurists were second-hand embarrassed by this.