Conservatives Descend Upon DC and There Was Much Rejoicing
More Judicial Coup Antics Were Hurled Against the Trump White House Tonight
Wasted Land
Democrats Once Again Fail to Protect Women
Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley Joins Race to Replace Governor Tony Evers
Colorado Sheriff Was Forced to Release a Violent Criminal Thanks to Democrats' Soft-on-Cri...
And Then They're Gone
California Proves Mail-In Voting Is Doggone Crazy
Arizona Republicans Hold the Line Against Left-Wing Agenda
Target Effort to Play Politics Is a Case Study in Corporate Confusion and...
Requiring Proof of Citizenship Shouldn't Be Controversial
Trump’s 18-0 Winning Streak in SCOTUS
E. Jean Carroll Admits to Using 'Tricks' to Convince Jury in Trump Case
Democrats Abandon Capitalism As Socialist Wing Gains Power
Dhillon: Reparations Plan Proposed by North Carolina County Is Against Federal Law
Tipsheet

Sotomayor Overturned 9-0, Ricci Overturned 5-4

A commentary piece in The National Journal sheds new light on the importance of the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision to overturn Ricci v. DeStefano. Author Stuart Taylor Jr. explains:
Advertisement
The Supreme Court's predictable 5-4 vote to reverse the decision... does not by itself prove that the Sotomayor position was unreasonable... What's more striking is that the court was unanimous in rejecting the Sotomayor panel's specific holding. Her holding was that New Haven's decision to spurn the test results must be upheld based solely on the fact that highly disproportionate numbers of blacks had done badly on the exam and might file a "disparate-impact" lawsuit -- regardless of whether the exam was valid or the lawsuit could succeed.
Taylor points out that even liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who authored the dissent, objected to Sotomayor's opinion that disparate racial results alone justified the city of New Haven for throwing out the results of the exam. Read the full piece here.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos