Sacre Bleu! Thieves Swipe Napoleonic Jewels From the Louvre In Less Than Four...
Zohran Mamdani's Chief of Staff Confirms He Hates the NYPD
Socialized Medicine Was the Democrats' Goal All Along
Calling Out the Cancer Within the Right
The People Who WANT a King
Did the Socialist Win the NYC Mayoral Debate?
Is There a Mitzvah to Be Stupid?
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 290: What the Bible Says About Finding God’s...
Trump Says He Will Use 'Schumer Shutdown' To Permanently Cut Programs
FBI Pittsburgh Arrested 19 Violent Fugitives
VP Vance Rallies Marines While Old Liberals Jeer Trump
'Kings Get Guillotines': Leftists Show Out Threatening Trump
Ohio Man Faces Up to 20 Years in Federal Prison if Convicted for...
Hate Problem or Heart Problem?
When Cities Choose Chaos: Why Federal Intervention Is Not Only Legal — It’s...
Tipsheet

Sotomayor Overturned 9-0, Ricci Overturned 5-4

A commentary piece in The National Journal sheds new light on the importance of the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision to overturn Ricci v. DeStefano. Author Stuart Taylor Jr. explains:
Advertisement
The Supreme Court's predictable 5-4 vote to reverse the decision... does not by itself prove that the Sotomayor position was unreasonable... What's more striking is that the court was unanimous in rejecting the Sotomayor panel's specific holding. Her holding was that New Haven's decision to spurn the test results must be upheld based solely on the fact that highly disproportionate numbers of blacks had done badly on the exam and might file a "disparate-impact" lawsuit -- regardless of whether the exam was valid or the lawsuit could succeed.
Taylor points out that even liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who authored the dissent, objected to Sotomayor's opinion that disparate racial results alone justified the city of New Haven for throwing out the results of the exam. Read the full piece here.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement