Did Marjorie Taylor Greene Tip Off Leftists About Where Trump Was Eating...
The Washington Post's Pushed a Massive LIE About the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis
Did the Face of Somali Daycare Fraud in Minnesota Shut Down?
Hilton Hotel Worker in Texas Who Warned About ICE Presence on Social Media...
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting Is No More
Israeli Military Intelligence Gave a Shocking Update on the Iran Protests
America vs. F**K YOU!
Is America Destroying Itself?
Indiana Credit Union CEO Sentenced to Federal Prison in $285K Bank Fraud Scheme
Why Did Democrat Senator Ruben Gallego Just Lie About This ICE Officer?
Illegal Immigrant Used Stolen Identity to Vote in Multiple U.S. Elections, Feds Say
Detroit Teen Faces up to $5M Fine, 40 Years in Prison After Guilty...
The Portland Police Chief Is Shedding Tears for Venezuelan Gang Members Shot by...
A Judge Is Blocking Trump From Stopping Payments to Daycare Fraudsters
WHOOPS: Leftists Stage Massive Anti-ICE Protest Outside of the Wrong Hotel
Tipsheet

Fracking Saves Water

Contrary to the conventional teachings of environmentalists, hydraulic fracturing (i.e., fracking) has at least one major environmental benefit: saving water.

Advertisement

Although most Americans are disturbingly ignorant about fracking, it is an issue of critical importance not only with respect to the environment but also in foreign policy and the economy. Typically, the debate is framed around priorities. If you care more about the environment, you are against fracking; but if you care more about energy independence and domestic economic opportunities, you are for fracking.

However, a new study out of the University of Texas at Austin - one of the top schools in the world for studying energy and engineering - disrupts the usual dichotomy. In a world where more and more climate change scientists are concerned about the effects of drought, the latest research shows that the water-intensive fracking method of extracting natural gas actually saves water overall.

Climate Central has the details (emphasis mine):

Electricity produced using natural gas combustion turbines and natural gas combined-cycle generators requires roughly 30 percent of the water needed for coal power plants. The study estimates that the amount of water saved by shifting a power plant from coal to natural gas is up to 50 times the amount of water lost in fracking to extract the natural gas from underground shale formations.

The study’s authors estimate that for every gallon of water used to frack for natural gas, Texas saved 33 gallons of water by using that gas for electricity generation rather than producing the same amount of power with coal. During the 2011 drought, if Texas’ natural gas-fired power plants had generated electricity with coal, the state would have consumed an additional 32 billion gallons of water, or enough to supply about 870,000 people with water, accounting for water used for fracking, according to the study.

Advertisement

Environmental activists have long pushed for an end to fracking in America, or at least a drastic increase in governmental regulations. If they are truly concerned with climate change, the recent research should make them think twice.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement