CNN's Scott Jennings Drops the Mic on Abrego Garcia, and the Libs Lost...
Battle of Los Angeles: Anti-ICE Leftists Go Berserk Against Federal Agents, Storm DHS...
Elon Musk Deleted a Lot of Tweets About Trump as Feud Settles Down...Somewhat
Canada Wants to Be More Energy Independent. There's One Big Problem.
Simone Biles Weighed in on Transgenders in Women's Sports By Attacking Riley Gaines....
Linda McMahon Explains Why Harvard and Columbia are Finally Falling in Line
They Lost Their Son in a Freak Accident—Now They Might Lose Their Freedom...
The Men of D-Day Are Watching Elon and Donald
Infighting is Not Good, But Not Unexpected, Either
FBI Finds Fauci's Phone That Has Been Missing for Years
Riley Gaines and Simone Biles Had a Showdown About Transgender Athletes
Kash Patel's Home Swatted, Says Attack Was Meant to Silence Conservatives and Expose...
Trump Responds to the Return ofAlleged MS-13 Member Abrego Garcia
SNAP Back: Reforming American Health Will Restore Our Economy
Make Pride Sane Again
Tipsheet

Federal Judge: Remove Cross Erected in 1954 Honoring Veterans

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America took issue with a cross erected on a San Diego mountain in 1954 honoring veterans of the Korean War. After decades of battling the separation of church and state in court, the memorial's Christian defenders are not ready to give up and will try taking the case to the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

CNN reports:

The cross was erected in 1954 in honor of Korean War veterans and has been the subject of near constant judicial back and forth since 1989, when two Vietnam War veterans filed suit saying it violated the California Constitution's "No Preference" clause.

Since the first lawsuit in 1989, the city of San Diego twice tried selling the property beneath the cross to the Mount Soledad Memorial Association, only to be stopped by the courts.

In 2004, the parties involved reached an agreement that would have moved the cross to a nearby church, but two congressmen intervened and inserted a rider into the 2005 omnibus budget bill that designated the property a national veterans memorial and authorized the federal government to accept the donation of the property.

This led to more fights and more court filings.

In 2006, three congressmen pushed through a bill calling for the government to seize the property by eminent domain -- calling it "a historically significant war memorial." The federal government took possession in August of that year.

A lawsuit was filed challenging that transfer almost immediately and that has led to Thursday's ruling.

Advertisement

Advocates of Christian public displays have a tougher battle in the San Diego case as a result of the aforementioned no preference clause. That clause, part of the California state constitution (Art. 1, Sec. 4), reads:

Free exercise and enjoyment of religion without discrimination or preference are guaranteed.

If the case is not taken up by the Supreme Court, the issue will likely be taken to Congress. Although secularists have won this battle, the war is far from over.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement