AG Bondi: Some 'Sick' Stuff on Jeffrey Epstein Is Dropping Tomorrow
Supreme Court Blocks Order From Lunatic Judge That Would've Forced Trump to Unfreeze...
College Speaker: The Holocaust Was Not Unique
'They Crossed the Line': Tom Homan Issues Threat to Activists Who Doxed ICE...
Brian Stelter's Outrage at White House Press Exclusions Meets His Past Support for...
Rachel Maddow's Very, Very, Very Special Friend
Firearms Policy Coalition Takes to Court to Argue Only Congress Can Create Laws
President Trump Signs New Executive Order on DOGE
Democratic Senator Claims Dan Bongino Has 'Zero Experience' to Be FBI Deputy Director
Two Airplanes at Reagan National Airport Narrowly Avoided a Collision
Legacy Media Outlets Really Ought to Calm Down Over White House's Decision on...
Trump, Vance Put the Mainstream Media in Their Place When Taking Questions at...
Shiri Bibas' Family Is Suing Al-Jazeera
Trump Encouraged by GOP Lawmakers to Recognize West Bank As Israeli Territory
Pam Bondi Dismisses Biden-Era DEI Lawsuits Involving Merit-Based Hiring of Firefighters, C...
Tipsheet

Lawsuits That Would Search for New Clinton Emails Have Been Dismissed

Two lawsuits that asked for the FBI to continue its investigation into Hillary Clinton's missing emails, one filed by Judicial Watch and the other by Cause of Action Institute, were dismissed by a federal judge on Tuesday.

Advertisement

According to reporting from The Hill, this is the second time U.S District Judge James Boasberg has stopped lawsuits filed by the groups. 

In his decision, Judge Boasberg explained that because the FBI had provided new information regarding Clinton's emails, there is no reason to believe that any additional information was withheld or that further information concerning the emails is recoverable. Due to this fact, the judge said the lawsuits "cast no real doubt on that conclusion."

Judge Boasberg also stated that though the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals explained that the State Department had not done enough to recover all of Clinton's emails, the lawsuits do not require the FBI to continue to look anywhere and everywhere for further emails that may or may not exist. If the emails did happen to be held by another party, officials would not know where to begin to figure out who and where those parties are.

From Boasberg's ruling:

While it is plausible, albeit barely, that some third parties might retain relevant records nearly a decade after the conversations, and that the FBI might convince such parties to turn them over voluntarily, the Attorney General has no way to know who those third parties might be. The FBI understandably deemed this path too far afield to pursue, and the Court once again concludes that it is implausible that the Attorney General would buck its own investigative arm to demand otherwise. The Court of Appeals may have asked the Government to “shak[e] the tree harder” for more emails, but it never suggested that the FBI must shake every tree in every forest, without knowing whether they are fruit trees.

Advertisement

As for the Clinton emails that have been recovered, as reported by CNN at the end of October, President Trump has asked the State Department "to accelerate the release of any remaining Hillary Clinton emails in its possession as soon as possible."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement