This Dem Senator's Post About Tulsi Gabbard Resigning Was Absolutely Classless
Look Who Introduced President Trump at a Rally Yesterday. And Some Libs Were...
Democratic Party Gives Stephen Colbert Heartfelt Thanks for His Service
The Left Will Never Stop Justifying Political Violence
Rep. Hageman Channels the Wyoming Way on Energy, Natural Resources Issues
Why I Will Always Stand With Law Enforcement
Maryland Fraudster Allegedly Used 30 Stolen Identities in SNAP Scheme
Spencer Pratt Has an Unreal Fundraising Lead Over Woke LA Mayor Karen Bass
This IRGC-Trained Terrorist Had Plans to Assassinate Ivanka Trump
Student Activists Are a Symptom — Classroom Bias Is the Disease
States Are Not Bystanders in Homeland Defense
Equal Protection Means What It Says
Has Blaine Luetkemeyer Slayed the Corporate DEI Dragons?
Piers Morgan, Ben Gvir, and the Gift Nobody Asked for
Kansas Mom Says School Let Sex Offender Chaperone Field Trip
Tipsheet

Why Some Dems Are Seething Over David Hogg's PAC

Why Some Dems Are Seething Over David Hogg's PAC
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Talk about a bait and switch: David Hogg’s PAC, which supports progressive candidates, is facing criticism for backing out of commitments. This organization promised financial support for many campaigns but ended up leaving them high and dry, and many people are unhappy about it.  

Advertisement

No doubt, Leaders We Deserve, the group's name, has some successes, but there have also been very public splits. For some races, the PAC’s spokesperson pretty much admitted they quit after learning there was no path to victory. Folks, this is what you do before you endorse (via Axios): 

Multiple campaigns backed by Hogg's PAC fumed after primary losses that the group dangled hopes of financial commitments that never materialized. 

First it was Irene Shin: The Washington Post reported last July that Leaders We Deserve backed off a commitment to spend $400,000 on the 38-year-old Virginia state delegate's behalf in a U.S. House special election that was won by now-Rep. James Walkinshaw (D-Va.).

Now sources close to the campaign of Robert Peters, a 40-year-old Illinois state senator who finished a distant third in the primary to succeed Rep. Robin Kelly (D-Ill.), are telling a similar story. 

Leaders We Deserve is defending their strategy, arguing that it would be foolish to spend money on candidates they believe will lose by a landslide no matter how much they invest. 

What we're hearing: The sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid professional retaliation, told Axios the group initially expressed enthusiasm after endorsing Peters in May and said he would be a top priority. 

Leaders We Deserve, the sources said, promised the Peters campaign a "sizable investment" and told an ally of the campaign they would spend $1 million on his behalf and make a public announcement to that effect.

In October, the campaign was told that Leaders We Deserve would not be investing in the race, according to the sources and Leaders We Deserve. 

The sources close to the Peters campaign also said Leaders We Deserve encouraged them to take steps to moderate their image, including writing a position paper for AIPAC and not taking an endorsement from Justice Democrats. 

The other side: "Leaders We Deserve was proud to endorse Robert Peters, worked closely with his campaign, helped pay for two polls, and found that there was absolutely no path to victory for him in IL-02," said Leaders We Deserve spokesperson Matilda Bress. 

Advertisement

This is a Democrat mess. Watch from afar, with a nice bourbon in hand. 

 

 Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos