This Latest Move Hopefully Resolves Issues With a Key Holdout to Trump's Fed...
Guess Who Could Be Doing the Press Briefings With Karoline Leavitt on Maternity...
So Much for 'Taxing the Rich'
Patty Murray Just Made a Ridiculous Claim About Democrats Defunding ICE
Trump Administration Launches Civil Rights Investigation Into New York City's Department o...
U.S. Court of Appeals Just Dealt Trump Administration a Blow on Asylum Claims
On WHCA Weekend, Substack Celebrates ‘Independent Journalism’ by Trotting Out Castoff Corp...
The NY Times Tries and Fails to Gin Up Sympathy for Laid Off...
The Official Democrat X Account Tried Deleting Its Tweet Attacking Hung Cao...but There...
J.K. Rowling Offers Support After Trans Assault in Scottish Women’s Prison Sparks Backlash
Former VA AG Explains Why The State's New Congressional Map is Likely To...
The Department of Justice Announces It's Bringing Back Death by Firing Squad in...
The Trump Administration Announces a New Round of Negotiations As Iran Begs for...
Iran Activates Retired 30-Year-Old Super Tanker As They Run Out of Places to...
Leading CA Gov Candidate Says US Should've Been More Aggressive on Asylum, Blames...
Tipsheet

The Reactions to Justice Jackson's Questions During Birthright Citizenship Argument Were Gold

The Reactions to Justice Jackson's Questions During Birthright Citizenship Argument Were Gold
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Things don’t look good for the Trump administration on the birthright citizenship case. There seems to be a strong majority skeptical of their challenge to the legal idea, even though one might argue that the Founders never envisioned millions of people crossing our border without wanting to assimilate, breeding like rabbits to claim many benefits paid for by us taxpayers.   

Advertisement

How can someone, for example, meet the domicile benchmark when existing law states that those entering the US illegally can be deported if caught by the police?  

When Justice Gorsuch questioned if the government was citing Roman law, it was not the best start, but at least that wing of the court was going off precedent or inquiring about it through the Constitution. Yet Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s example was, well, incoherent. It did provide some grade-A reactions, though: 

Advertisement
Advertisement

I mean, what is happening, folks? 

No doubt the other eight jurists were second-hand embarrassed by this. 

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos