After This Answer From ActBlue's CEO, Republicans Should've Expected This Wouldn't Go Well
Here's What Karmelo Anthony's Mother Said Outside the Courthouse Following Her Son's Guilt...
The AP Amazingly Declares in Court It Does Not Need to Follow Its...
Ignore All of the World Cup Meltdowns; This German Road Trip Account Marveling...
Spencer Pratt Isn’t Laughing at Jimmy Kimmel’s 'Jokes'
Here's What Victor Davis Hanson Has to Say About Graham Platner's Victory in...
Democrats' Struggle With Men Reflects a Deeper Cultural Disconnect
8 Indicted for Allegedly Threatening University of Michigan Leaders, Jewish Federation
Massachusetts Doctor Sentenced to Nearly 5 Years for Healthcare Fraud, Tax Evasion, Money...
CENTCOM Confirms U.S. Resumes Strikes on Iran After Helicopter Shot Down
Democrat Rep. Summer Lee Says Equity Policies Are Only a Threat to White...
Romanian Man Sentenced to 5 Years, Ordered to Pay $11M for Walmart Card-Skimming...
Republicans Add to Narrow House Majority With New Member
Here's How Much Oil Went Through the Strait of Hormuz Under a 'Secret...
Philadelphia Teachers Just Admitted the Real Reason Behind the Failure of the Public...
Tipsheet

The Reactions to Justice Jackson's Questions During Birthright Citizenship Argument Were Gold

The Reactions to Justice Jackson's Questions During Birthright Citizenship Argument Were Gold
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Things don’t look good for the Trump administration on the birthright citizenship case. There seems to be a strong majority skeptical of their challenge to the legal idea, even though one might argue that the Founders never envisioned millions of people crossing our border without wanting to assimilate, breeding like rabbits to claim many benefits paid for by us taxpayers.   

Advertisement

How can someone, for example, meet the domicile benchmark when existing law states that those entering the US illegally can be deported if caught by the police?  

When Justice Gorsuch questioned if the government was citing Roman law, it was not the best start, but at least that wing of the court was going off precedent or inquiring about it through the Constitution. Yet Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s example was, well, incoherent. It did provide some grade-A reactions, though: 

Advertisement
Advertisement

I mean, what is happening, folks? 

No doubt the other eight jurists were second-hand embarrassed by this. 

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos