Hollywood Woke Moralizing Is the Pits
You Don't Own Me
Daily Beast Has a Desperately Deceptive Epstein Hit, and the BBC Appeases Dog-Hating...
The Abuse of Liberty Is As Dangerous As the Abuse of Power
Elitist 'Public' Broadcasting Defines 'Viewpoint Discrimination'
New York's Governor Seems Indifferent to the Health Consequences of a Steep Tax...
Why the Shield of the Americas Matters Now: Noem’s Latin American Visit Signals...
A Breakthrough Within Reach: Why Trump/Kennedy Should Lead on Psychedelic Medicine
Conversion Therapy Wins Big in SCOTUS
Indiana: The Crossroads of America — and the ‘Reproductive Justice’ Debate
A Republic, If Our Media Let Us Keep It
The Context Behind the Cardinal Being Denied Entry to One of Christianity’s Holy...
Celebrating 250 Years of Women’s Influence in America
Infinite Immigration Is the Law of the Land According to This Radical Judge
Tipsheet

Watch CNN's Scott Jennings Shred This Dem's Take on Iran. It Was Embarrassing.

Watch CNN's Scott Jennings Shred This Dem's Take on Iran. It Was Embarrassing.
AP Photo/Ron Harris

You’ve got to be kidding me, lady. That’s where you want to go with this regarding Operation Epic Fury, and that’s what you used to gauge the mood? No wonder Scott Jennings steamrolled you. To his credit, he did not really lay into her; he let her point do that on its own, but later added that spikes in gas prices and a local state house race in Florida aren’t what should guide national security policy. It was New York Democrat Christine Quinn who made those silly points about Trump and Iran: 

Advertisement

QUINN: “Here in the States, I think we’re seeing the impact of this already as it relates to the midterms coming up.” 

“I mean, look at the Republicans. You all just lost something in Trump’s backyard.”

“I mean, if that doesn’t send a message about how freaked out and scared and worried the American people are, I don’t know what would.” 

JENNINGS: “First of all, I think making national security decisions based on a state house result in Florida in an off-year election is not a great way to make national security policy.” 

“That would be my rebuttal to that.”

“Number two, generally, you want the commander in chief, in my opinion, to make national security decisions based on one thing, is this in the best interest of protecting the American people?” 

“The decision he obviously made was that I’ve set a red line, they’re not going to have nuclear weapons, and I’m tired of them for 47 years terrorizing the world, shooting us with missiles, shooting our allies with missiles, having this aggressive navy.”

“And they crossed a line with him, and now he’s enforcing it.” 

“And to say, well, if gas goes up a nickel or we have a state house race in Florida, we can no longer operate national security policy, I think, is an extremely shortsighted and cynical way to assess this.” 

“At the end of this, if they’re totally defanged, if they meet our objectives here in terms of nukes and missiles and navy and exporting terror, if there are new people in charge who are willing to abide by some kind of an agreement, that is a net positive for us, for the world!” 

Advertisement

Trump will address the nation on the Iran strikes on Wednesday evening. 

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement