Read the Note Some Laid Off State Department Staffer Left Behind. It's Hilarious.
So, That's How That Judge Who Shut Down ICE Raids in Southern CA...
Wait...That's Why the NYT Raced to Get Their Mamdani Race Hoax Story Published
I'm Not Doing 'Tolerance' Anymore
Total Authorization
So What Were Our Genuine Enemies Up to While Brennan Headed the CIA?
One Final Push Could End the Mullahs Regime in Iran
Kash Patel Too Deep in Russiagate Probe to Walk Away from FBI
LA Offers Free Cash to Illegal Aliens Afraid to Leave Their Homes Amid...
Trump Authorizes ICE, Border Patrol to Arrest 'Slimeballs' Attacking Officers with Rocks,...
Google Silences Conservatives. Luxxle Fights Back.
Europe’s Environmental Laws Threaten American Businesses
All Eyes on Trump and Netanyahu
When Will Congress Support Trump's AI Agenda?
Tipsheet

Here's What Led Senator Kennedy to Call This Anti-Trump Clown a Total Whack Job

AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) said something spot-on about this anti-Trump clown, though it was during a hearing that ironically was not about the president or the Russian collusion hoax. It was about cryptocurrency, and Kennedy was defending Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY). Richard Painter is a notable anti-Trump commentator and Russian collusion hoax peddler. He thought Trump was a Russian agent—we don’t need to relitigate this nonsense. 

Advertisement

Painter accused Gillibrand of being bought off by the crypto bros, which did not sit well with Kennedy. He called on Painter to apologize, later calling him a total "whack job," which is when things went off the rails. 

While this was a great exchange, the basis for the hearing was establishing a framework for cryptocurrency regulation (via Axios):

The hearing Wednesday was to discuss a Senate market structure bill, one that would establish a legal framework for broad U.S. crypto regulation. 

The House's version, CLARITY, runs more than 200 pages and gets detailed about which kinds of assets are subject to the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission or the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The big picture: The question now is how detailed the Senate's version will get, versus how much rulemaking power it will leave for regulators in the name of fostering innovation. 

"I hear you saying that digital assets are different," Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said to the industry representatives on the hearing's panel. "Digital assets need special rules. I agree with that.

"The obvious question is, what should those rules be, and to what extent should we allow you to draft them?"

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement