Seeing the Dems Defend Platner Is Glorious to Watch
Former Trump Communications Operative Doled Out a Crazy Take About Graham Platner on...
CBS News' Shakeup and the Future of the Mainstream Press
Lithuanian Ambassador Varvuolis Reflects on First Year in Washington
Our Billionaires Kind of Stink
When Cowardly Journalists Abuse Anonymous Sourcing
The View’s Joy Behar Would Rather Smear Trump Than Help Americans Afford Medicine
Which Party Will Recover First From Its Current Self-Harm?
Randi Weingarten Is the Real Threat to Public Education
Trust Fund Commies
Election Day Does Not Wait for Litigation
Free Speech Comes With Responsibility
Four Senate Republicans Join Democrats to Sink Save America Act Vote
Former Arkansas Nonprofit Director Sentenced for $1.7 Million Fraud Scheme
American Who Lived in China Pleads Guilty to Acting as CCP Spy Inside...
Tipsheet

Peter Strzok Isn't Taking the Durham Report Findings Very Well

Peter Strzok Isn't Taking the Durham Report Findings Very Well
AP Photo/Evan Vucci

Disgraced FBI Agent Peter Strzok isn’t taking the latest Russian collusion update well. Maybe that’s because the report submitted by Special Counsel John Durham, which totaled over 300 pages, eviscerated the FBI and finally concluded that the whole investigation was a hoax. Not a shred of tangible evidence could suggest that Donald Trump was colluding with Moscow, and there was certainly not enough to greenlight a full-blown counterintelligence probe into the matter. The report confirmed what we already knew but took a katana to the credibility and professionalism the bureau prided itself on for decades. The FBI is the Democratic Party’s errand boy, and the report, like other IG reports on the Department of Justice, points to political bias as the primary motivator with all these witch-hunt inquiries into the former president.

Advertisement

Strzok responded to the Durham findings predictably:

He had to double down. Strzok wrote a book about how he was right about Trump and Russian collusion. He would have to return his advance if he admitted that his unprofessional demeanor and bias blinded him into signing off on a spy operation against the Trump campaign. Through the Durham investigation, we also know that the FBI had evidence that the Steele Dossier, which provided the cause for the counterintelligence probe, might have been riddled with Russian disinformation. It was a paid opposition research project paid for by the Clinton campaign. It was unverifiable and is now regarded as a fancy work of fiction. The bureau suffocated that exculpatory evidence to keep their illegal spy warrants on Trump and his people intact. 

Advertisement

Related:

RUSSIA COLLUSION

Strzok was a top counterintelligence agent whose extramarital tryst with FBI lawyer Lisa Page highlighted how standards had fallen. Not over their dalliance but the tens of thousands of anti-Trump text messages, including one that had Strzok assuring Page that they would stop Trump. He was fired shortly after his testimony before Congress on the matter. Strzok was in the human resources department, demoted after his extramarital affair was revealed to then-Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who took over the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation. 

Advertisement

Grab a drink and watch the show; we have other folks who are not going to be Durham’s conclusions well.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement