Chuck Schumer Is In for a Huge Fight – With His Own...
Democrats Will Lose Their Minds After What Trump Just Threatened to Do if...
Elon Musk Offers a Lifeline to Unpaid TSA Workers Amid DHS Shutdown
You Won't Believe What This Democrat Staffer Did to Help ICE Detainees
Wisconsin Socialists Are Itching to Open Government-Run Grocery Stores
Nick Shirley Hires Private Security Because Leftists Doxx Him
Anti-Trump Republican Has Political Operative Tied to the Most Radical Democrats in Texas...
Temple Israel Pictures Show Aftermath of Terrorist Targeting Children’s Daycare
Shocker: Iran Lied About Not Having Intermediate-Range Missiles
Missouri Nonprofit Leader Sentenced to 16 Years in $19.7M Child Meal Fraud
Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Investigator Behind the Russian Collusion Hoax, Die...
You're Gonna Love Trump's Ultimatum to Democrats on DHS Funding
Why Is This Democrat So Desperate to Keep Pushing Fake Endorsements?
5 More Plead Guilty in $14.6M Feeding Our Future Fraud
This Democrat Claims To Be Moderate, But Backs Huge Firearms Crackdowns on Law-Abiding...
Tipsheet

Federal Judge (Who Was Nominated By Clinton) Tells Electors They Must Vote For Statewide Winner, Called Lawsuit A ‘Political Stunt’

Federal Judge (Who Was Nominated By Clinton) Tells Electors They Must Vote For Statewide Winner, Called Lawsuit A ‘Political Stunt’

Well, the Hamilton Electors just got punched in the mouth with their long shot lawsuit to free electors who are bound by their statewide results. A federal judge nominated by then-President Bill Clinton told two Colorado electors who filed the lawsuit that they must vote for whoever won their state in the 2016 election, throwing a massive wet blanket on the hail Mary attempt by this group to block President-elect Donald J. Trump from assuming the presidency. In fact, that’s exactly what the judge said, calling the whole exercise a political stunt that could disrupt a peaceful transition. While Clinton won Colorado, there are actually some electors who don't want to vote for her on December 19 (via AP):

Advertisement

A federal judge dealt a severe setback Monday to a longshot plan to deny Donald Trump the presidency through the Electoral College, refusing to suspend a Colorado law requiring the state's nine electors to vote for the presidential candidate who won the state in November.

U.S. District Judge Wiley Daniel denied a request by two Colorado electors who contended that the law binding their vote to Colorado vote winner Hillary Clinton violated their First Amendment rights and the intents of the Constitution's framers. The electors had sought the right to vote for someone other than Clinton in order to unite behind a consensus Republican other than Trump when the Electoral College convenes on Dec. 19.

Daniel found that suspending the Colorado requirement would have harmed the state's voters and jeopardized a peaceful presidential transition. "Part of me thinks this is really a political stunt to prevent Donald Trump from becoming president," said Daniel, who was nominated to the bench by Bill Clinton in 1995.

These electors recently formed a 527 group to raise money for such legal battles, hoping they can be released from their respective state laws concerning binding the statewide vote to the Electoral College vote. The alternative candidate for these cadre of electors was Ohio Gov. John Kasich, who bluntly rejected the maneuver and said he would not accept whatever may come of this futile bid to stop Trump. Like the Green Party’s Jill Stein recount shenanigans, it’s time for everyone who is still shell-shocked over Trump’s upset win to accept it. It’s been weeks since Election Day 2016. The game is over. Period. Trump will be our next president.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement