AG Bondi: Some 'Sick' Stuff on Jeffrey Epstein Is Dropping Tomorrow
Supreme Court Blocks Order From Lunatic Judge That Would've Forced Trump to Unfreeze...
College Speaker: The Holocaust Was Not Unique
'They Crossed the Line': Tom Homan Issues Threat to Activists Who Doxed ICE...
Brian Stelter's Outrage at White House Press Exclusions Meets His Past Support for...
Rachel Maddow's Very, Very, Very Special Friend
Firearms Policy Coalition Takes to Court to Argue Only Congress Can Create Laws
President Trump Signs New Executive Order on DOGE
Democratic Senator Claims Dan Bongino Has 'Zero Experience' to Be FBI Deputy Director
Two Airplanes at Reagan National Airport Narrowly Avoided a Collision
Legacy Media Outlets Really Ought to Calm Down Over White House's Decision on...
Trump, Vance Put the Mainstream Media in Their Place When Taking Questions at...
Shiri Bibas' Family Is Suing Al-Jazeera
Trump Encouraged by GOP Lawmakers to Recognize West Bank As Israeli Territory
Pam Bondi Dismisses Biden-Era DEI Lawsuits Involving Merit-Based Hiring of Firefighters, C...
Tipsheet

Trump Administration Directs Federal Communications Commission to Combat Big Tech

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

The Department of Commerce has filed a petition with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in an effort to combat online censorship. The action is in response to President Trump’s May 28 Executive Order in which he directed the agency to clarify regulations related to current federal communications law. 

Advertisement

According to a statement from White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, the petition amends Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act to make clear that social media companies that alter or editorialize users’ speech will not escape civil liability. It also requests that the FCC clarify whether Section 230 provides protection for social media companies’ content moderation decisions, determine the conditions under which social media policies so dictate the flow of information that they are no longer protected, and seek transparency on companies’ moderation practices.

Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross emphasized that the purpose of the petition was not to control social media companies but rather to promote “free and open debate” among Americans, especially as the election approaches.

“It has long been the policy of the United States to foster a robust marketplace of ideas on the Internet and the free flow of information around the world,” Ross said in a press release. “President Trump is committed to protecting the rights of all Americans to express their views and not face unjustified restrictions or selective censorship from a handful of powerful companies.”

Advertisement

The news comes in the midst of Big Tech’s all-out assault on viral videos of doctors contradicting the narrative on hydroxychloroquine and lockdowns. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube have been actively censoring and removing the footage which was originally live-streamed Monday by Breitbart. The video received 14 million views in six hours and was the most-engaged post on Facebook on Monday, garnering nearly 600,000 shares before it was banned. It also caused “Breitbart” and “hydroxychloroquine” to trend on Twitter. The company partially disabled Donald Trump Jr.’s account after he retweeted the video, claiming he was "violating the policy on spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19."

In his original executive order, President Trump said America “must foster and protect diverse viewpoints in today’s digital communications environment” and “seek transparency and accountability from online platforms.” Trump doubled-down on that message in a tweet Wednesday, threatening to “bring fairness to Big Tech” if Congress does not act. 

Advertisement

The president has an ally in Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, who introduced a bill last month to empower Americans to sue Big Tech companies that selectively censored political speech and hid content created by their competitors. The bill stated that companies who want to receive Section 230 protections must bind themselves contractually to a “duty of good faith.” 

Whether Hawley's colleagues will step up and join him or leave the dirty work to Trump remains to be seen. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement