Texas Supreme Court Ends Abbott's Push to Expel Lawmakers Who Fled the State...
Steve Cohen, TN's Lone Democrat, Announces He's Not Seeking Re-Election
Dexter Taylor Shows Why New York's Anti-Gunners Can't Be Taken Seriously
Trump Just Clowned 'Vegan' James Talarico Into Oblivion With These Remarks
Gavin Newsom’s Former Chief of Staff Cops to Massive Fraud, Tax Scam, and...
Tim Walz Called Steve Scalise a 'Bootlicker' and Scalise's Response Was Perfect
The Justice Department Found Yale Discriminated Against White, Asian Med School Applicants
The Massachusetts Judge Who Gave Cambridge Gunman a Light Sentence Knew He Was...
As Gavin Newsom Touts CA's Education Spending, Spot What He Doesn't Brag About
Judge Sues Illinois Supreme Court for Unconstitutional Dismissal, Violation of Free Speech...
Venezuela Opposition Leader Refuses to Take the Bait As CNN Presses Her on...
The UAE Has a Plan to Circumvent the Iran and the Strait of...
The CIA Lands in Havana: Trump Sends a Direct Message to the Cuban...
Greg Gutfeld Mocks Whoopi Goldberg After She Accuses Trump of Castrating the United...
Here's How Seriously the US Took Digital Security on President Trump's Trip to...
Tipsheet

15 States Ask a Federal Court to Keep Title 42 in Place

15 States Ask a Federal Court to Keep Title 42 in Place
Townhall Media/Julio Rosas

On Monday, 15 states asked a federal judge to keep Title 42 in place, a COVID-19-era policy which allows Border Patrol agents to quickly expel immigrants from crossing the border into the U.S. 

Advertisement

Last week, as Julio covered, Title 42 was given an expiration date of Dec. 21. The 15 states that asked the judge to keep the policy in place said that lifting Title 42 it will “directly harm” the states and “impose financial burdens” on them. 

“The States have sovereign and quasi-sovereign interests in controlling their borders, limiting the persons present within those borders, excluding persons carrying communicable diseases, and the enforcement of immigration law,” the filing said, according to CNBC.

“Wherever those aliens end up, they will impose financial burdens on the states involuntarily hosting them,” it added. It was filed by the attorneys general of Arizona, Louisiana, Alabama, Alaska, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming. 

Julio pointed out in his report that U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan granted the Biden administration’s request for five more weeks until U.S. Customs and Border Protections quits enforcement of Title 42. Reportedly, Sullivan sided with immigration advocates, including the American Civil Liberties Union, that Title 42 was being utilized to enforce border security more than as a public health precaution.

Advertisement

In his ruling, CNBC noted, Sullivan cited the Administrative Procedures Act and described Title 42 as “arbitrary and capricious.”

Title 42 took effect during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic under President Donald Trump. The Biden administration kept the policy in place and attempted to end it earlier this year. A federal judge kept it in place. 

As Julio mentioned, some shelter directors near the U.S.-Mexico border are concerned about the impact lifting Title 42 will have on their communities. Many shelters are already at capacity with Title 42 in place. And, states like Texas and Florida have sent migrants to “sanctuary cities” to help share the burden of the border crisis.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement