Seditionist Blue Falcon Democrats Stunned to Be Held Accountable for Their Behavior
Sorry, Deep State, Leaking Classified Communiques Isn't Going to Work This Time
Five Things to Be Thankful for in 2025
Can the 'Lost Generation' Be Found?
Thanksgiving to God and America
What You Got—That's All You Got
Hineni: Thanksgiving’s Answer to Ayeka
President Washington’s Thanksgiving Proclamation Endures
Communism Never Works, Not Even With Pilgrims
Jeffrey Epstein: A Hero to Democrats
Trump Orders Re-Vetting of Afghani Immigrants After D.C. Shooting of Two National Guardsme...
Lowe’s Home Centers to Pay $12M Penalty for Lead Paint Violations in Home...
National Guard Shooter Identified As Afghani 29-Year-Old Rahmanullah Lakanwal
From Sacred Space to Political Target: How New York Is Flirting With the...
Michigan Pharmacist Sentenced to 46 Months for $4M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Federal District Judge Rules Several Indiana Abortion Laws 'Unconstitutional'

AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File

On Tuesday, a federal judge from United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana struck down a variety of Indiana abortion laws, including the state’s sweeping ban on telemedicine abortion consultations, ruling them “unconstitutional.”

Advertisement

The lawsuit, Whole Woman’s Health Alliance, et al. v. Rokita began in 2018 as Whole Woman’s Health Alliance filed a lawsuit against a comprehensive list of regulations surrounding abortion. The lawsuit challenged several pieces of legislation, including mandatory waiting periods for women seeking an abortion and mandatory counseling.

U.S. District Court Judge Sarah Evans Barker issued injunctions against several of Indiana’s abortion-restriction laws, including legislation requiring face-to-face consultations with a doctor prior to an abortion and the outlaw of second-trimester abortions outside of hospitals and surgery centers. Additionally, Barker ruled against Indiana laws requiring that women seeking abortions are told that human life begins at conception and that a fetus might feel pain at or before 20 weeks.

“For the reasons explicated in the following decision, based on the Court's thorough review and consideration of all evidence presented at trial, the following provisions are ruled unconstitutional, and their enforcement permanently enjoined: The Telemedicine Ban, the In-Person Examination Requirement, the Physician-Only Law as it relates to the first-trimester provision of medication abortion, the Second-Trimester Hospitalization Requirement, and the Mandatory Disclosures and Facility Requirements identified herein,” Barker wrote in the court documents.

In the court documents, Barker cited Dr. Daniel Grossman, an outspoken pro-abortion advocate, several times, as he served as the “Plaintiffs' expert witness specializing in gynecology, abortion care, and public health.” 

Advertisement

Related:

INDIANA PRO LIFE

In a statement, Amy Hagstrom Miller, the president and CEO of Whole Woman’s Health Alliance, praised Barker’s ruling. “This is a tremendous victory for abortion rights - just when Hoosiers and this entire country need it most,” Miller said in the statement. “Providing abortion care in Indiana has not been easy, and Whole Woman’s Health of South Bend is grateful to the courts for upholding the right to evidence-based abortion care by overturning these unjust and burdensome regulations.”

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita responded to the ruling in a Facebook post. “Today’s mixed decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Rokita only strengthens our resolve to keep fighting for the lives of unborn children and the health of mothers,” Rokita said in the post. “We will continue to fight to defend Indiana’s commonsense abortion laws and to build a culture of life in Indiana.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement