Democrats Are Really Going with 'Graham Platner Was Too Stupid to Know What...
Chris Cuomo on the Dems' Latest Line for the Schumer Shutdown: They're Lying
Oh, Maine Dem Senate Candidate Also Trained With an Antifa-like Rifle Group?
Dem Who Said the Quiet Part Out Loud About the Schumer Shutdown Now...
Yes, a Hunting Stand Was Found With a Clear Sight Line to Trump's...
Texas Dem Suggests She’ll Slash Republicans in the Throat If They Try to...
Another Deadly Crash Tied to Gavin Newsom’s DMV: Illegal Immigrant Trucker Kills Three...
Inflation Smashes Economists Expectations in September As Prices Hold Steady and Wages Ros...
'Sophia Strong': 12-Year-Old Annunciation Shooting Survivor Finally Returns Home After Mir...
Schumer Shutdown: Democrats Block Pay to Use Pain As Political Leverage While Donor...
Following Day Long Demonstration, Coast Guard Security Opened Fire on U-Haul Driver Outsid...
NYC Mayoral Frontrunner Zohran Mamdani Linked Again to Anti-LGBTQ Figures — This Time...
Nobody Asked for This: The IRS’s Plan to Take Over Tax Filing
DOJ Drops the Hammer on California Officials After Threats to Arrest ICE
'Gates of Hell?' More Like a House of Cards: Iran’s Bluster Does Not...
Tipsheet

Here's What TikTok Had to Say After Federal Court Upheld Law Banning App

AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File

A federal appeals court on Friday upheld a law requiring TikTok’s parent company to sell the app or face a ban in the United States. 

“The First Amendment exists to protect free speech in the United States. Here the Government acted solely to protect that freedom from a foreign adversary nation and to limit that adversary’s ability to gather data on people in the United States. For these reasons the petitions are denied,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit wrote in denying TikTok’s petition. 

Advertisement

The law, signed earlier this year by President Biden, requires ByteDance to divest from TikTok by Jan. 19 or face a U.S. ban.

TikTok and ByteDance sued to block the law in May, alongside several content creators, arguing that divestment was practically impossible. As a result, the law effectively bans TikTok nationwide, which they contend is unconstitutional. 

However, the Biden administration has argued that TikTok can be used by the Chinese government to “achieve its overarching objective to undermine American interests.” 

The court sided with the Biden administration, finding that the “significant” impacts of the TikTok ban are justified by the government’s national security concerns.

“Unless TikTok executes a qualified divestiture by January 19, 2025 — or the President grants a 90-day extension based upon progress towards a qualified divestiture — its platform will effectively be unavailable in the United States, at least for a time,” the court wrote in Friday’s opinion.

“Consequently, TikTok’s millions of users will need to find alternative media of communication,” it continued. “That burden is attributable to the PRC’s hybrid commercial threat to U.S. national security, not to the U.S. Government, which engaged with TikTok through a multi-year process in an effort to find an alternative solution.”  (The Hill)

Advertisement

The company on Friday said it is appealing the ruling to the Supreme Court. 

"The Supreme Court has an established historical record of protecting Americans' right to free speech, and we expect they will do just that on this important constitutional issue," the company said. "Unfortunately, the TikTok ban was conceived and pushed through based upon inaccurate, flawed and hypothetical information, resulting in outright censorship of the American people. The TikTok ban, unless stopped, will silence the voices of over 170 million Americans here in the US and around the world on January 19th, 2025."

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement