CNN's Kaitlan Collins Is Infuriated That No One Cares About Trump Blasting Dems...
Watch Scott Jennings Slaps Down Lib Media Claim That Illegals Won't Get Health...
Wait, a Dem Rep Really Said This About Trump During the Schumer Shutdown
The Latest Sombrero-Mariachi Responses to the Schumer Shutdown Are Gold
No Apologies: Proud to Stand With Israel, Proud to Defend the West
Trump Posted a New Clip Trolling Hakeem Jeffries...and Another That's Really Going to...
Democrats Thought They Had the Upper Hand in the Schumer Shutdown. WaPo Says...
Qatar Is Bankrolling Global Terror—and It’s a Direct Threat to the West
Let's Stop Pretending About Charlie Kirk's Assassination
Empty Lives
This 2019 Clip of Democrats Is Coming Back to Haunt Them Amid Shutdown...
Amidst Concerns About Left-Wing Lawfare, States Should Review Who They Have on Contract...
It’s Time to Choose Cooperation Over Continued Chaos
Talking Point vs. Truth
Direct Democracy Can Save Younger Generations From Penury
Tipsheet

Court Hands Down 'Unconscionable' Ruling in Case About School That Gave Vaccine to Child Without Consent

AP Photo/Ted S. Warren

The Vermont Supreme Court ruled last week that a family whose child was vaccinated against COVID-19 without consent cannot sue the school district. 

Despite the father informing a school official prior to the November 2021 clinic that he did not want his child vaccinated—and the child verbally protesting (“Dad said no”)—the child was given one dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine after accidentally wearing the name tag of another student, the ruling states. According to Crisis in the Classroom, "The second student had allegedly already received a vaccination earlier that day." 

Advertisement

Academy School officials eventually realized the error and called L.P.'s parents to apologize, who later removed their child from the school, according to the ruling. 

The Vermont Supreme Court ruled Friday state and school officials involved in the matter are protected under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, which provides liability immunity. In the event of a public health emergency, the PREP Act ensures certain "covered persons" are immune from claims causally related to the use of a "covered countermeasure." A vaccine is considered a covered countermeasure.

"To avoid dismissal on immunity grounds, plaintiffs would have had to present wellpleaded allegations showing that (1) at least one defendant was not a covered person, (2) some conduct by a defendant was not causally related to administering a covered countermeasure, (3) the substance injected into L.P. was not a covered countermeasure, or (4) there was no PREP Act declaration in effect at the time L.P. was injected," the ruling reads.

The high court's ruling affirms a January 2023 decision by a state superior court. (CITC)

Advertisement

 Critics blasted the ruling.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos