What Hunter Biden Said About Illegal Immigration Is Rather Trumpian
Here's Bari Weiss' Memo on the CECOT Story. Notice Anything Wrong?
Dems, You Think an Initiative With *That* Title Will Help You Win Back...
DC's Gun Ban Might Be on Borrowed Time Because of This Lawsuit
When Your Last Name Is Biden, Being Out of Touch Is Par for...
America First Legal Files Civil Rights Complaint Over Colorado School District's Race-Base...
Zohran Mamdani Chalks Up His Antisemitic Staff Problem As a 'Wide Variety of...
Why Is Wisconsin AG Josh Kaul Refusing to Turn State Voter Data Over...
Here's Why a British Retailer Pulled This 'Offensive' Christmas Card
Greta Thunberg Arrested Again, This Time Under the UK's Terrorism Act
The Q3 US GDP Number Has Dropped...and the Media Are Calling It 'Unexpected'
NPR Puts the Kibosh on This Oft-Quoted Professor and 'Expert'
ICE Reveals Festive Deportation Ad Featuring Santa Clause
Nearly 100 Minnesota Mayors Blast Tim Walz for 'Fraud, Unchecked Spending'
This University Just Canned a Trans Instructor for Anti-Christian Discrimination
Tipsheet
Premium

After Disappointing Murthy v. Missouri Ruling, Rand Paul Makes a Suggestion

Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

In what’s widely been described as a blow to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday determined in Murthy v. Missouri that a group of social media users and two states—Louisiana and Missouri—lacked standing. The case, which has now been sent back to the lower courts, was about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to censor speech it said was misinformation.  

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said the move “permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think."

But Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has a solution, which he reminded Americans about on X. 

"Today's SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression," he said. "It's time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans."

The bill prohibits executive branch employees and contractors from censoring constitutionally protected free speech, imposing "severe penalties" on those who do. 

As part of protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights, the bill would also:

  • Mandate frequent publicly accessible reports from the heads of executive branch agencies detailing the communications between an executive branch agency and Big Tech.

  • Ensure that federal grant money is not misused to label media organizations as sources of misinformation or disinformation.

  • Terminate several programs and authorities that threaten free speech and other constitutionally protected rights. (Judiciary Committee)


“Americans are free people and we do not take infringements upon our liberties lightly," he said at the time. 

“Censorship is a major threat to freedom today," noted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who introduced companion legislation in the House. "It is clear that Big Government must be more transparent, and that bureaucrats must be held accountable for censorship. The Free Speech Protection Act accomplishes that and gives individuals remedies for censorship to protect vital First Amendment freedoms."


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement