In Address to the Nation, Trump Sends Another Warning to Iran
Scott Jennings Took an Ex-DNC Spokesperson to the Cleaners Over the Legality of...
Why Would Anyone Vote for These People?
Completely Obliterated
DOJ Risks Squandering Teddy Roosevelt’s Anti-Monopoly Antitrust Legacy
Limited, Virtuous Government Means Limited, Virtuous Government
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 273: What the Bible Says About Hair
A Time for Giving Thanks
The 10 Minute Lifestyle
Gen Z Gender Madness Takes Center Stage
Iran Escalates Rhetoric After Trump Flattens Nuclear Sites
Dems Panic as Trump Obliterates Iran’s Nuclear Threat—Push War Powers Stunt While World...
Top Officials Speak at Pentagon: Trump Achieved What Many Before Could Not
AOC: Trump's Decision to Bomb Iran Was 'Disastrous'
Netanyahu: 'Trump and the United States Acted With A Lot of Strength'
Tipsheet
Premium

NIH Official Makes Huge Admission About Gain-of-Function Research

In 2021, Anthony Fauci, then director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) got into a heated exchange over whether the National Institutes of Health funds gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

"For years, Dr. Ralph Baric, a virologist in the U.S., has been collaborating with Dr. Shi Zhengli from the Wuhan Virology Institute, sharing his discoveries about how to create superviruses. This gain-of-function research has been funded by the NIH,” Paul said. “Dr. Fauci, do you still support funding of the NIH lab in Wuhan?"

"With all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect,” Fauci shot back. “The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology."

That exchange is making its rounds again on social media in light of the recent admission from NIH principal deputy director Lawrence Tabak during questioning Thursday from lawmakers on the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.

“Dr. Tabak, did NIH fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through EcoHealth [Alliance]?” asked Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ).

“It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research,” Tabak responded. “If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.”

That admission comes after federal public health officials have for years denied or evaded the question altogether. 

Tabak claimed gain-of-function research, which alters viruses to make them more infectious, is harmless. 

“This is research, the generic term [gain-of-function], is research that goes on in many, many labs around the country. It is not regulated. And the reason it’s not regulated is it poses no threat or harm to anybody,” he said. 


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement