America’s Stupidity Crisis
Cornyn Never Represented the Will of His Voters
Pam Bondi Is Back, but Also Dealing With Some Health Issues
250 Years
Pennsylvania Primary Results Unpacked: Democrats Go Far Left, While GOP Centers
Resistance Is Not Leadership
Why the Left Hates America’s Founders: Education
America Needs More, Not Fewer, Billionaires
Graham Platner's Comedic Potential Lost in Joke Drought
It's on Us to Choose How to Use Our Freedom
Mark Cuban Is Right About 'Big Medicine,' but Wrong About the Cure
The Right Way With Technology
Trump Rejects EO on AI
Your Grocery Bill Has a New Boss
America’s First Official Day
Tipsheet

ADF Sets the Record Straight After the Left Attempts to Discredit 303 Creative Case

ADF Sets the Record Straight After the Left Attempts to Discredit 303 Creative Case
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Alliance Defending Freedom set the record straight this week after liberal media outlets, activists, and public figures sought to discredit the 303 Creative v. Elenis case, the legal group, and their client, Christian web designer Lorie Smith. 

Advertisement

The New Republic, for example, published a widely circulated piece headlined, “The Mysterious Case of the Fake Gay Marriage Website, the Real Straight Man, and the Supreme Court,” suggesting Smith and ADF “invented a gay couple in need of a wedding website…”

ADF addressed the accusations head on in a Twitter thread this week.

Specifically addressing the claims made in The New Republic piece, ADF said it was a "lie."

ADF also pushed back on claims made by Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser.

Advertisement

“This desperate attempt to malign ADF, our client, and a critical ruling affirming all Americans’ free speech blatantly distorts the facts of the case and the nature of pre-enforcement lawsuits,” said ADF CEO, President, and General Counsel Kristen Waggoner. “To say that Lorie Smith or ADF fabricated a request for a same-sex wedding website is a lie. It would make no sense to have fabricated a request because one wasn’t required for the court to decide her case. To pretend that a request that nowhere featured in the Supreme Court’s decision was at ‘the heart’ of the case demonstrates an ignorance regarding the legal principles involved. And it’s telling that many who push this false narrative can’t bring themselves to consider the more likely scenario that ‘Stewart’ or another activist did in fact submit the request.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement